Digital Asset Dock Metadata Tagging Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to accurately, efficiently, and quickly identify and tag digital media content assets, leading to issues such as inaccurate tagging, long metadata processing times, and difficulties in finding correctly tagged assets, especially during the transition from physical to digital media management.

Innovation Solution

The Digital Asset Dock (DAD) system provides a method for assigning metadata tags to media content assets through global preset functionality, upload security policies, dynamic/live metadata tagging, and automatic tagging, allowing for streamlined asset ingestion and management within an Enterprise Media Framework.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual metadata tagging is performed, then tagging accuracy may be maintained, but processing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging accuracyVSAvoidmetadata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating metadata tags during the asset upload process itself, before the asset is fully processed and stored. This allows tagging to occur in parallel with upload operations, eliminating sequential waiting time while maintaining accuracy through structured tag templates and validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by implementing automatic metadata extraction and tag assignment based on asset properties, file metadata, and predefined templates. The system serves itself by autonomously completing the tagging process without requiring manual intervention, thereby dramatically reducing processing time while maintaining consistent accuracy through systematic rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If comprehensive metadata tagging is implemented, then asset searchability and management improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset searchabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments metadata tagging into structured templates with predefined fields, categories, and hierarchical relationships. By dividing the comprehensive metadata requirement into manageable, standardized segments, the system improves asset searchability through organized tagging while reducing system complexity through template reusability and modular tag structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements universal tag templates that can be applied across multiple asset types and workflows. These multi-functional templates serve various purposes (categorization, search, rights management, workflow routing) simultaneously, thereby improving asset management capabilities without proportionally increasing system complexity through reuse and standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If physical media workflows are eliminated, then processing costs decrease, but digital asset management capabilities must be established

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing costsVSAvoiddigital asset management capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical media workflows with digital asset management processes, substituting mechanical handling, storage, and distribution with automated digital workflows. This substitution reduces processing costs by eliminating physical media expenses while establishing efficient digital capabilities through automated metadata management, centralized storage, and digital distribution networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses digital copying and replication of assets instead of physical media duplication. Multiple copies of digital assets can be created and distributed without the costs and complexities of physical media production, thereby reducing processing costs while establishing robust digital asset management capabilities through efficient replication and distribution mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10204103B2Digital asset dock (DAD)
Publication Date: 2019.02.12 TFCF DIGITAL ENTERPRISES INC
  • US10204103B2 patent drawing
  • US10204103B2 patent drawing
  • US10204103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, apparatus, article of manufacture, and computer program product provide the ability to ingest a media content file. The media content file to be uploaded and managed in an enterprise media framework (EMF) is selected. Media content file(s) to be tagged are also selected. A mask matcher identifies a mask (having multiple parts) that identifies a file structure of information associated with the media content file. For each of the multiple parts and based on the information associated with the media content file, metadata is calculated and applied to the media content file.