Digital Asset Transaction Verification via Dual-Device Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Digital asset transactions are vulnerable to tampering and cybercrime, as malicious actors can implant malware or manipulate transaction interfaces, leading to unauthorized asset transfers without user awareness.

Innovation Solution

A digital asset transaction method that verifies transaction content on two different devices, one connected to the Internet and another with restricted Internet access, using multiple check messages and authentication data to ensure transaction integrity and prevent tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If digital asset transactions are performed via Internet-connected devices, then transaction convenience and speed are improved, but vulnerability to tampering and cybercrime increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction convenienceVSAvoidvulnerability to tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The transaction verification process is segmented into multiple independent verification steps across different devices. The first device displays and receives confirmation for transaction details, while the second device independently verifies the same transaction content and provides authentication. This segmentation ensures that even if one device is compromised, the transaction cannot be executed without the second device's verification, thus resolving the contradiction between convenience and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary verification mechanism where a second device acts as a mediator between the user and the transaction execution. This intermediary device independently verifies transaction content and provides authentication data, preventing direct tampering between the Internet-connected device and the transaction system. The intermediary layer blocks harmful factors while maintaining transaction convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple verification steps are implemented across different devices, then transaction security is improved, but transaction process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidtransaction process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second device is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a verification device and an authentication source. It not only displays transaction content for verification but also generates and transmits authentication data (such as digital signatures or one-time passwords) back to the first device. This universal design reduces the need for separate authentication systems, thereby managing complexity while enhancing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the second device's verification result directly influences the transaction execution. The authentication data from the second device is fed back to the first device to confirm whether the transaction should proceed. This structured feedback loop ensures security through multiple verifications while maintaining a manageable process through clear decision points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a closed device with restricted Internet access is used for verification, then resistance to remote tampering is improved, but device connectivity and usability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to remote tamperingVSAvoiddevice connectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closed device is designed with local quality characteristics, having restricted Internet access specifically for security purposes while maintaining full functionality for its core verification function. The device can still communicate with the first device via local connection (Bluetooth, NFC, or local network) to receive transaction data and transmit authentication data. This selective connectivity provides resistance to remote tampering while preserving necessary usability for the verification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11232444B2Digital asset transaction method
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 COOLBITX LTD(GB)
  • US11232444B2 patent drawing
  • US11232444B2 patent drawing
  • US11232444B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A digital asset transaction method is implemented using a connected device connectable to the Internet and a closed device not connectable to the Internet and includes the following steps: the connected device displays a first check message according to a transaction data input thereto by a user; the connected device transmits the transaction data to the closed device after the user confirms the first check message matches the transaction data; the closed device displays a second check message according to the transaction data transmitted thereto by the connected device; the closed device transmits an authentication data to the connected device after the user confirms the second check message matches the transaction data; and the connected device executes the digital asset transaction after receiving the authentication data from the closed device. With the above method, the user can verify transaction content on different devices and decide whether to execute the transaction.