Digital Companion System for Adaptive Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital companions lack the ability to develop long-term relationships with users that can lead to significant changes in psychological states or behaviors, particularly in therapeutic contexts such as affinity therapy for autistic individuals, due to limitations in intelligent interaction and adaptation.

Innovation Solution

A digital companion system that utilizes an intelligent agent, combining human and automated processes, to engage in successive conversations and interactions, adapting character and behavior over time, and using real-time user input to tailor responses and evolve the companion's role from friend to therapist, incorporating natural language processing and voice morphing to provide consistent and personalized therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an automated intelligent agent is used to provide therapy, then productivity and scalability are improved, but the ability to develop genuine long-term relationships and adapt to individual user needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapy delivery efficiencyVSAvoidrelationship development capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges automated intelligent agent capabilities with human therapist involvement in a hybrid system. The automated agent handles routine interactions and data processing, while human therapists provide periodic guidance and complex decision-making, combining the scalability of automation with the relational expertise of humans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a knowledge graph as an intermediary structure that mediates between user inputs and therapeutic responses. This knowledge graph accumulates and structures relationship data over time, enabling the automated agent to adapt responses based on accumulated understanding while maintaining consistency in the therapeutic relationship.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If successive conversations are facilitated over a long time period to develop relationships, then therapeutic effectiveness is improved, but the complexity of tracking and managing user state changes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic outcomeVSAvoidstate tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the complex, unstructured data from successive conversations into structured parameters within a knowledge graph. By converting qualitative relationship developments into quantifiable state parameters, the system can track changes over time without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The therapeutic process is segmented into discrete conversational interactions, each contributing to incremental state changes. The knowledge graph divides the overall relationship development into manageable state transitions, allowing the system to process long-term therapy as a sequence of discrete, trackable events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the intelligent agent learns from scratch rather than being pre-trained, then adaptability to individual users is improved, but the time required to reach effective therapeutic interaction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidlearning period
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing a structured knowledge graph framework and initial interaction protocols before actual therapy begins. This pre-established structure allows the agent to start learning from scratch with a head start, reducing the effective learning period while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9704103B2Digital companions for human users
Publication Date: 2017.07.11 THE AFFINITY PROJECT
  • US9704103B2 patent drawing
  • US9704103B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A succession of conversations are facilitated between a user of a device and a non-human companion portrayed on the device, to develop a relationship between the user and the non-human companion over a time period that spans the successive conversations. The relationship is developed between the user and the non-human companion to cause a change in a state of the user over the time period. A conversation is facilitated by presenting a segment of speech of the non-human companion to the user and detecting a segment of speech of the user, the segments including a portion of the conversation. At the device, information is received from an intelligent agent about a next segment of speech to be presented to the user, as determined by the intelligent agent based on intelligent processes applied to the segment of speech of the user and to the change in state to be caused.