Digital Composition Hashing for Design Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As digital content, including designs for physical objects, becomes increasingly valuable and manipulable, there is a need to prove originality and authorship without revealing the entire design or its components, especially in cases where sub-elements and their combinations are valuable.

Innovation Solution

A digital composition hashing method that creates a hashed structure from a design file, allowing users to authenticate specific features and combinations of features by storing a marked-up design as a composition file, which includes metadata and sub-level designs, and using a notary service to validate and store this information in a blockchain or database, ensuring secure timestamping and authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the entire design file is stored and revealed to prove authorship, then authentication reliability is improved, but the value and security of the design are compromised due to full exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoiddesign exposure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The design file is segmented into multiple features or elements, each of which can be independently hashed and authenticated. This allows selective disclosure of specific features without exposing the entire design, resolving the contradiction between authentication reliability and design security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Individual features or elements are extracted from the complete design file for separate hashing and authentication. This enables proof of authorship for specific components without revealing the full design, balancing authentication needs with protection of intellectual property

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the entire design file is hashed to prove authorship, then authentication reliability is improved, but the ability to protect specific valuable sub-elements is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidloss of selective protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The design is divided into discrete features or elements that can be independently hashed. This segmentation enables selective authentication of specific valuable sub-elements without exposing unrelated portions of the design, maintaining both authentication reliability and selective protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different features of the design are treated with different levels of protection and authentication. Local quality allows the system to apply hashing and authentication selectively to specific valuable elements while leaving other parts unchanged or unauthenticated, preserving both authentication capability and selective protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a notary service is used to validate and store design information, then authentication reliability is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A notary service acts as an intermediary between the design creator and the authentication system. This mediator validates and stores hashed design information in a blockchain or database, providing reliable authentication while abstracting the complexity of the hashing and storage mechanisms from the user

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If detailed metadata and sub-level designs are stored to enable selective authentication, then authentication capability is improved, but information storage requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselective authentication capabilityVSAvoiddata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design data is segmented into hierarchical levels with metadata at each level. This structure enables selective authentication by allowing the system to access and hash specific sub-level designs without processing the entire dataset, improving adaptability while managing complexity through organized data architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11356268B2Digital composition hashing
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11356268B2 patent drawing
  • US11356268B2 patent drawing
  • US11356268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples associated with digital composition hashing are described. One example method includes receiving a digital composition file from a user. The digital composition file may include a top-level design and a hierarchy of sub-level designs. A hashed structure may be generated from the digital composition file, where a node in the hashed structure for the first sub-level design is generated based on hashes of sub-level designs below the first sub-level design in the hierarchy. The hashed structure and a hash of the digital composition file are stored in association with the user.