Digital Content Annotation Service for Post-Distribution Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The electronic publication process often follows traditional print media procedures, lacking efficient mechanisms for authors and creators to receive feedback and revisions on digital content, such as eBooks, after distribution.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows users to annotate digital content on devices, with annotations being compiled and reported back to content creators through an annotation service, enabling organized feedback and revisions, including typographical corrections, comments, and thematic suggestions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If electronic content is distributed with easy revision capability, then content can be updated after distribution, but the traditional formal publication process with editing and proofing steps is bypassed, potentially reducing content quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent update capabilityVSAvoidcontent quality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting annotations from multiple users before the content is formally revised. Annotations are gathered, compiled, and organized in advance, allowing creators to review and evaluate feedback before making changes, thus maintaining quality control while enabling post-distribution updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where user annotations are collected, compiled into reports, and presented to content creators. This feedback loop enables creators to receive organized user input, evaluate suggestions, and make informed revision decisions, balancing ease of update with quality maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If user feedback is collected through informal annotation, then user engagement increases, but the feedback lacks organization and structure needed for efficient revision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidfeedback organization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The annotation service acts as an intermediary between users and creators. It receives unstructured annotations from users, compiles them into organized reports with proper formatting and grouping, and delivers them to creators. This intermediary process preserves user engagement while recovering and organizing the information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the feedback collection and processing into distinct functional components: annotation input from users, compilation and organization by the service, and presentation to creators. This segmentation allows each component to optimize for its specific function while maintaining overall system organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9769008B1Annotations for content creation feedback
Publication Date: 2017.09.19 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9769008B1 patent drawing
  • US9769008B1 patent drawing
  • US9769008B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Content is distributed electronically to a plurality of users. As the users consume the content, they may annotate the content to indicate corrections, comments, or other information. Annotations are collected at a server and reported back to content creators, such as authors, publishers, translators, editors, etc.