Automated Digital Content Quality Control via Frame Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current digital content conversion processes require extensive manual quality control, which is time-consuming and costly, and existing automated systems often fail to ensure accurate conversions, leading to potential errors and 'false passes'.

Innovation Solution

An automated, algorithmic quality control process that converts digital video content from one frame rate to another, such as 24-frame to 30-frame or 24-frame to 25-frame, by referencing corresponding frames and using image recognition techniques to verify frame rate, size, and content integrity, with notifications for defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated quality control systems are implemented, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates leading to false passes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control efficiencyVSAvoidconversion accuracy verification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The quality control process is divided into multiple independent verification stages: initial automated conversion check, intermediate quality control checkpoints, and final verification. Each stage focuses on specific conversion parameters (frame rate, resolution, content integrity) to provide comprehensive accuracy verification without requiring complete manual review of the entire conversion process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple quality control checkpoints act as intermediaries between the automated conversion system and final delivery. These checkpoints include automated algorithmic verification and manual review stages that collectively ensure conversion accuracy while maintaining productivity. The intermediary checkpoints catch errors that single-stage systems might miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual quality control is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion accuracy verificationVSAvoidquality control duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Automated conversion and initial quality checks are performed before manual review to pre-identify and correct obvious errors. This preliminary automated processing reduces the time required for manual verification by filtering out conversions that meet quality thresholds, allowing human operators to focus only on edge cases and complex verification tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies automated verification algorithms extensively to cover all conversion parameters, then supplements with selective manual review only where needed. This partial automation approach exceeds what would be done manually alone, catching errors that human operators might miss while avoiding the time cost of complete manual review of every conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If extensive manual quality control is performed, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control accuracyVSAvoidconversion throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification process is segmented into automated preliminary checks and selective manual review stages. This segmentation allows high-volume automated processing for routine conversions while maintaining reliable manual verification for complex or edge-case conversions, thereby preserving both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where quality control results from automated and manual stages inform subsequent processing. Conversions that pass automated checks with high confidence proceed directly to delivery, while those with uncertain results are routed for manual review. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable quality control while maintaining high productivity for straightforward conversions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10257461B2Digital content conversion quality control system and method
Publication Date: 2019.04.09 NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA LLC
  • US10257461B2 patent drawing
  • US10257461B2 patent drawing
  • US10257461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated, algorithmic quality control is performed for digital content converted from one form or format to another. Such conversion may be made of movies, television programs, feature films, advertisements, or any other content. The conversion process may be semi or fully automated, and may include a range of alterations, such as pulldown or frame rate conversions, size and/or resolution conversions, addition of content, deletion of content, and so forth. Actual content contained in pre-and post-converted frames is utilized, such as by image recognition techniques, as a base for the quality control routines. Audio data may also be considered. The quality control is fully or nearly fully automated with minimal manual involvement.