Digital Content Validation Using Aggregated Signature Authorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital data validation and authentication methods lack security and certainty, especially in untrusted environments, and are costly and difficult to implement across various communication protocols.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for validating digital content using a device-controlled communication network, involving a device with a processing unit and memory, utilizing an aggregated digital signature calculated via a one-way accumulator, and verifying authorization data and accreditation using verification keys to ensure authenticity and authorization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional digital signature certification chains are used, then digital data can be validated, but security certainty is insufficient and cannot ensure high confidence in the signatory's authority

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity certaintyVSAvoidauthentication accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple digital signatures into a single aggregated digital signature that represents the collective authentication of multiple authorities. This merging approach enhances security certainty by requiring consensus from multiple trusted parties while maintaining authentication accuracy through the mathematical properties of aggregate signature schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a trusted third party (TTP) that issues credentials and verifies aggregated signatures. This intermediary enhances security certainty by providing a centralized authority that can validate the authenticity of aggregate signatures, while maintaining system decentralization for actual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple security protocols are implemented for different industries and communication methods, then security coverage is improved, but implementation complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal authentication framework based on aggregate signatures that can be applied across different industries and communication protocols. The core cryptographic primitives remain the same regardless of application context, allowing a single implementation to serve multiple security needs without requiring separate protocol stacks for each use case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows the same aggregate signature framework to be adapted to different security requirements by changing parameters such as the number of authorities involved, the type of credentials used, and the verification threshold. This enables flexible deployment from low-security to high-security scenarios without fundamental changes to the system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive authentication mechanisms are deployed to ensure high security, then validation reliability is improved, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation reliabilityVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses cryptographic copying where a single aggregated signature can represent multiple individual signatures simultaneously. This allows the system to achieve the security of multiple separate authentication mechanisms while incurring the computational and storage costs of only a single compact signature structure, significantly reducing implementation costs compared to verifying each signature separately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If detailed verification of signatory authority is performed, then authentication accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary authentication by having authorities sign individual components before aggregation. The aggregate signature structure pre-encodes the verification logic, allowing receiving parties to verify the collective authority of multiple signers in a single operation rather than performing sequential verification of each signature and their associated credentials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12513003B2Method and system for validating a digital content
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 SICPA HOLDING SA
  • US12513003B2 patent drawing
  • US12513003B2 patent drawing
  • US12513003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to the technical field of the validation and the authentication of a digital data, such as, for example, a digital document. Particularly, the invention relates to the technical field of the validation of a digital content of a digital message, such as an operation certified by an entity allowing a controller to execute said operation.