Digital Control Plan Twin for Continuous Process Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional control plans in manufacturing are limited by their human-readable format, which restricts their use in automation, thereby reducing their value in ensuring quality assurance and process optimization.

Innovation Solution

A digital twin of a control plan is created, allowing for the digital representation, analysis, and optimization of product and process conformity through a digital system model that connects with real-world data from sensors, enabling continuous verification and validation and transforming traditional text-based information into machine-executable models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control plan is maintained in human-readable format, then ease of operation is improved, but extent of automation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidextent of automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (copy) of the control plan that exists in both human-readable and machine-executable formats. This digital replica enables automation while the original human-readable version maintains ease of operation for operators. The digital twin captures all control elements, parameters, and logic, allowing automated systems to execute control plan requirements without compromising human readability of the source documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the control plan from static human-readable text into a dynamic digital model with executable parameters. By changing the format parameters from text-only to structured digital data with executable logic, the system enables automation while preserving the original human-readable version for operator reference. The digital twin maintains parameter equivalence between human and machine representations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If control plan is transformed into machine-executable format, then extent of automation is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextent of automationVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control plan information into multiple representations: the original human-readable control plan for operator reference and a separate digital twin for machine execution. This segmentation allows each version to serve its intended purpose independently - the human version maintains ease of operation while the digital version enables automation, eliminating the need to choose one format over the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as an executable control model for automation, a validation reference for quality assurance, and a data source for analytics. The system maintains compatibility with the original human-readable control plan while adding these additional functions, making the overall system more versatile without compromising operator ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If verification and validation are performed at set stages, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to stop/resume cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables continuous verification and validation by executing the digital twin alongside the physical manufacturing process in real-time. Instead of stopping production at predetermined stages to perform validation, the digital twin continuously processes manufacturing data and validates conformance as production proceeds. This continuous action maintains manufacturing precision while eliminating stop/resume cycles that reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the digital twin receives real-time manufacturing data, performs validation, and provides feedback on conformance. This continuous feedback mechanism maintains manufacturing precision by immediately identifying deviations while allowing production to continue uninterrupted, unlike traditional staged validation that requires production stoppages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If digital twin is used for continuous verification, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin is a virtual copy of the control plan that runs in software rather than requiring additional physical hardware. This copying approach enables continuous verification and validation without adding physical device complexity - the digital twin executes on existing computing infrastructure while providing enhanced productivity through continuous monitoring and validation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentEP4089493A1Development of a product using a process control plan digital twin
Publication Date: 2022.11.16 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4089493A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4089493A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4089493A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A method (300) of developing a product (202) is provided that includes generating (302) a digital system model (DSM) (226) that describes the product and a manufacturing process (214) for the product, and generating (304) a digital twin (DTw) (323) of an instance (234) of a component (230) of the manufacturing process, the DTw including a digital replica (236) of the instance. The method includes receiving (306) attribute data (218) for attributes of process/process characteristics subject to sources of variation that affect product quality. The digital replica is executed (308) with input of the attribute data, and thereby updating the DTw to replicate the instance of the component of the manufacturing process as performed. A data analysis of the manufacturing process is performed (310) based on the DTw as updated, and the manufacturing process is modified (312) based on the data analysis to reduce variability in one or more product characteristics. The DTws of multiple instances may be used to generate (340) further improvement.