Digital Evidence Control System for Chain of Custody Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The legal system faces challenges in maintaining the authenticity and chain of custody of digital evidence, which is exacerbated by its intangible nature and the difficulty in tracking its handling across multiple locations, potentially leading to evidence being disallowed in court.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for controlling digital evidence by creating a case record, electronically storing digital evidence, and associating it with the case record, allowing for secure access and tracking while maintaining authenticity and chain of custody through a digital evidence control system that includes features like cloning, hashing, and role-based access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If digital evidence is stored and accessed by multiple individuals across different locations, then accessibility and collaboration are improved, but maintaining authenticity and chain of custody becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of digital evidenceVSAvoidauthenticity and chain of custody
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital replica or image of the original digital evidence and stores it in a secure database. This copy can be accessed by multiple authorized individuals without affecting the original evidence, thereby maintaining authenticity while improving accessibility. The copy is accompanied by metadata that tracks the chain of custody.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a digital evidence management system as an intermediary between the original evidence and multiple users. This system acts as a mediator that controls access, tracks usage, and maintains the chain of custody, allowing multiple individuals to access evidence while preserving its integrity and authenticity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If digital evidence is handled by numerous people in different locations, then investigative collaboration is improved, but tracking chain of custody becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestigative collaboration efficiencyVSAvoidchain of custody tracking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By creating a digital copy of the evidence with embedded metadata, the system enables multiple investigators to access and work with the same evidence simultaneously without requiring complex physical tracking mechanisms. The metadata automatically records access information, simplifying chain of custody tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The digital evidence management system automatically tracks and records chain of custody information through metadata that is generated and updated automatically with each access or modification. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual tracking by multiple personnel, reducing complexity while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If digital evidence is stored in electronic format, then ease of duplication and distribution is improved, but risk of corruption or destruction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduplication and distributionVSAvoidintegrity of digital evidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a secure digital copy of the original evidence and stores it in a controlled environment with access restrictions. This copy can be distributed to authorized users for viewing and analysis, but cannot be easily altered or destroyed, thereby maintaining integrity while enabling distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements protective measures in advance by creating checksums, hash values, or digital signatures of the original evidence before storage. These protective mechanisms allow the system to detect any corruption or unauthorized modification, providing a buffer against evidence degradation or destruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS12045903B2Method and apparatus for controlling digital evidence
Publication Date: 2024.07.23 SUMO LOGIC INC
  • US12045903B2 patent drawing
  • US12045903B2 patent drawing
  • US12045903B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for controlling digital evidence comprising creating a case record comprising information about an investigative case, electronically storing at least one piece of digital evidence into memory, and associating the stored at least one piece of evidence with the case record.