Digital Evidence Inconsistency Detection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Inconsistencies in digital evidence within incident records, such as discrepancies between witness accounts and video footage, lead to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in case management, requiring a system to detect and prioritize these inconsistencies to ensure timely resolution and maintain data integrity.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing an electronic processor to analyze multimedia data and first responder notes, determining inconsistencies and their priority levels through an incident type mapping and machine learning model, and taking appropriate notification actions based on these priorities to notify relevant users and manage access to incident records.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of evidence is performed to detect inconsistencies, then measurement precision of evidence accuracy is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with automated electronic processing systems. The electronic processor automatically compares incident record data against evidence data, performs consistency checks, and generates reports without human intervention, thereby maintaining measurement precision while eliminating time loss associated with manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service inconsistency detection where the record management system automatically performs its own consistency validation. The electronic processor independently compares data elements, identifies inconsistencies, and notifies relevant users without requiring external manual verification, thus improving efficiency while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive inconsistency detection is implemented, then reliability of incident records is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident record reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the inconsistency detection process into distinct modular components: data reception modules, comparison modules, inconsistency identification modules, and notification modules. Each module performs a specific function in the consistency verification process, making the overall complex system manageable through functional decomposition while maintaining high reliability through systematic checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated inconsistency detection is implemented, then productivity of record management is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecord management efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by performing inconsistency detection selectively rather than continuously. The electronic processor activates comprehensive checking only when incidents are created or updated, and performs targeted comparisons based on incident type and evidence categories, thereby improving productivity while reducing unnecessary energy consumption from constant monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11860837B2Determining inconsistencies in digital evidence
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11860837B2 patent drawing
  • US11860837B2 patent drawing
  • US11860837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for prioritizing and resolving inconsistencies in digital evidence. The system includes a database containing a first type of data and a second type of data related to an incident record and an electronic computing device including an electronic processor. The electronic processor is configured to receive the first and second types of data from the database, determine an inconsistency between the first and second types of data, and determine an incident type from the incident record. The electronic processor is also configured to determine whether a priority of the determined inconsistency meets a threshold case impact level. When the priority of the inconsistency meets the threshold case impact level, the electronic processor is configured to take a first notification action and when the priority of the inconsistency does not meet the threshold case impact level, the electronic processor is configured to take a second notification action.