Digital Inking Device Dynamic Interaction Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital inking devices face challenges in determining the selected input mode, distinguishing between users, and efficiently providing contextually relevant information, leading to inefficiencies and unnecessary resource usage.

Innovation Solution

A digital inking device that dynamically adapts its interaction model based on user activity and its relationship with a paired computer, using sensors to display or hide status indicators and UI controls, and enable/disable functionality, allowing for contextually relevant status information and user interface elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If status indicators are displayed on the paired computer screen to show input mode information, then users can determine the selected input mode, but valuable screen space is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput mode information visibilityVSAvoidscreen space
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the status indicator display from the paired computer screen (2D plane) to the digital inking device itself (physical object in 3D space). The display surface on the pen body shows color information and input mode status, eliminating the need to occupy screen real estate while maintaining information visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary display mechanism between the user and the paired computer. Instead of directly displaying status on the computer screen, the system uses the digital inking device's display surface as an intermediary to convey color and mode information, reducing the need for on-screen indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If the paired computer displays status indicators to show pen color and input mode, then users can identify the selected mode, but the indicators may be automatically hidden by applications requiring gestures to unhide

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatus indicator visibilityVSAvoiduser interaction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The digital inking device independently displays status information on its own display surface without requiring the paired computer to show indicators. The pen autonomously manages its own status display, showing color and mode information directly on the device, eliminating dependency on computer screen indicators that may be hidden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If the digital inking device provides comprehensive status information and UI controls, then users can access all input modes and settings, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput mode optionsVSAvoidUI control elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different functional qualities to different parts of the digital inking device. The display surface provides visual status information, the input surface receives gestures, and the processor manages interaction models. Each component has a specialized function, allowing comprehensive capabilities without uniform complexity throughout the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic interaction models that adapt the device's behavior based on context. The system selectively enables or disables certain input gestures and UI controls depending on the current interaction model, allowing comprehensive functionality when needed while simplifying the interface during active use to reduce perceived complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If sensors continuously monitor user activity and device proximity to dynamically adapt interaction models, then contextually relevant information is provided, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual interaction adaptationVSAvoidprocessing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic sampling of sensor data rather than continuous monitoring. The processor checks sensor inputs at intervals to determine when to transition between interaction models, reducing constant processing while still capturing relevant contextual changes in user activity and device proximity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically based on sensor input thresholds. Instead of continuous full-power processing, the processor adjusts its activity level based on detected conditions, entering lower-power states when no interaction is detected and activating full functionality only when contextual changes warrant interaction model transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3721327B1Dynamic interaction adaptation of a digital inking device
Publication Date: 2022.03.23 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP3721327B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3721327B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3721327B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A digital inking device can adapt its interaction modality to provide contextually relevant status information and contextually relevant user interface control elements based on a user's activity. An interaction model of a digital inking device can automatically adapt the display of particular control user interface control elements and particular status indicators based on one or more factors. For example, a digital inking device can select an interaction model from a number of interaction models based on a way a digital inking device is held by a user, a fingerprint of a user, an angle and/or distance of a digital inking device with respect to a paired computer, a particular grip a user has on a digital inking device, an amount of pressure that is used to hold a digital inking device, a contact pressure between a digital inking device and a paired computer, and/or one more user gestures.