Digital Model Synchronization for Field Service Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Field service practitioners face challenges in maintaining accurate interactions between real-world encounters and digital models, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in operational systems, and there is a need for a systematic protocol to facilitate bi-directional knowledge transfer between physical and back-end operations.

Innovation Solution

A model-centric approach utilizing a computerized digital model of a real-world physical system, enabling practitioners to perform CRUD-like operations (CREATE, READ, UPDATE, DELETE) through a mobile application that synchronizes interactions with the model, allowing for real-time data collection, validation, and updating, while ensuring compatibility with physical world scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If field service practitioners manually maintain interactions between real-world systems and digital models, then operational flexibility is preserved, but model accuracy and synchronization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-synchronization where the digital model automatically receives updates from physical system data through sensors and communication interfaces. The model autonomously maintains accuracy by continuously ingesting real-time data from the physical system without requiring manual intervention from field practitioners, thus resolving the contradiction between model accuracy and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where data from the physical system flows back to update the digital model in real-time. This automated feedback mechanism ensures the model remains synchronized with the actual physical state, improving reliability while the automated nature of the feedback reduces the operational burden on practitioners.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If real-time data collection and model synchronization are implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but data management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it represents the physical system state, enables predictive analytics, supports decision-making, and provides a platform for what-if scenarios. This multi-functionality consolidates various data management tasks into a single unified system, improving operational efficiency without proportionally increasing data management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer (the digital model platform) that mediates between raw sensor data and operational applications. This intermediary automatically handles data processing, validation, and distribution to various users and systems, reducing the burden of direct data management while enabling real-time operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If centralized model truth is implemented, then decision-making quality is improved, but system integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making qualityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources, sensors, and information streams into a single centralized digital model that serves as the source of truth. By consolidating these elements into one unified model, the system improves decision-making quality through comprehensive and accurate information while the automated integration processes reduce the manual complexity of maintaining such a centralized system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10136280B2Parallel user interaction with physical and modeled system
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10136280B2 patent drawing
  • US10136280B2 patent drawing
  • US10136280B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, computerized apparatus and computer program product for supporting parallel user interaction with physical and modeled system. A computerized digital model representing a real world physical system is obtained. An indication of a physical component of the system being subject to engagement by a user is received. A model component corresponding to the physical component is automatically determined. An interaction of the user with the model component is controlled based on at least one of the model and data obtained through engagement with the physical component.