Digital PLL Lock Detection With Adaptive Bandwidth Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing phase-locked loop (PLL) systems, particularly all-digital PLLs, face challenges in accurately determining lock state and efficiently managing closed-loop bandwidth, which affects their performance in wireless communication and electronic devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a bangbang phase-frequency detector to compare a reference clock signal with a feedback signal, detecting lock state by counting toggles of the comparison signal and adjusting closed-loop bandwidth based on lock state and capacitor utilization rates, with mode conversion between normal and automatic frequency control modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the PLL uses a traditional lock detection method, then the lock state determination is simple, but the detection accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelock state detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical or analog lock detection methods with a digital counting approach. The lock detector counts the number of toggles of the comparison signal generated by the BBPFD, using digital logic circuits (AND gate, counter, comparator) to determine lock state. This substitution of digital counting for traditional detection mechanisms improves measurement precision while maintaining manageable device complexity through standardized digital components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the PLL operates in normal mode with fixed bandwidth, then the circuit structure is simple, but the adaptability to different operating conditions is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth adaptabilityVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic bandwidth control by introducing a monitor circuit that tracks capacitor utilization rates in real-time. Based on the monitored utilization rate, the system dynamically switches between normal mode (fixed bandwidth) and AFC mode (adaptive bandwidth). This dynamic adaptation allows the PLL to optimize its bandwidth according to operating conditions, improving versatility while using standardized control circuits to manage the added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the closed-loop bandwidth parameter adaptively by switching between two operational modes. In normal mode, the bandwidth is fixed at a first value optimized for routine operation. When the monitor circuit detects capacitor utilization rates exceeding thresholds, the system switches to AFC mode where the bandwidth is adjusted to a second value. This parameter change strategy enables the PLL to adapt to different operating conditions without requiring a completely complex variable bandwidth circuit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the PLL uses adaptive bandwidth control with mode conversion, then the performance is improved, but the control circuit complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePLL performanceVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism through the monitor circuit that continuously monitors capacitor utilization rates and provides feedback to the mode conversion control logic. When the utilization rate exceeds predetermined thresholds, the feedback triggers a mode conversion from normal mode to AFC mode, adjusting the closed-loop bandwidth. This feedback-based control improves PLL reliability by preventing capacitor saturation and maintaining optimal performance, while using systematic feedback control to manage the complexity of the adaptive system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If the PLL operates without lock state detection, then the circuit is simpler, but the ability to control bandwidth based on lock state is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth control capabilityVSAvoiddetection and control circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the lock detection function with the bandwidth control function into an integrated system. The lock detector that counts comparison signal toggles not only determines lock state but also provides this information to the bandwidth control logic. Additionally, the monitor circuit that detects capacitor utilization rates is merged with the mode conversion control, creating a unified system that simultaneously performs lock detection, performance monitoring, and adaptive bandwidth control. This merging of functions improves versatility while reducing overall system complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8981824B2Phase-locked loop, method of operating the same, and devices having the same
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8981824B2 patent drawing
  • US8981824B2 patent drawing
  • US8981824B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating a phase-locked loop (PLL) such as an all-digital PLL includes operations of comparing a reference clock signal with a feedback signal of the PLL and outputting a comparison signal according to a result of the comparison, and detecting whether the PLL is in a lock state by using a number of times the comparison signal is toggled.