Digital RZ-DPSK Modulator Architecture Reducing Analog Complexity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electro-optic modulator systems for RZ-DPSK modulation are cumbersome due to the use of two separate modulators, leading to increased size, cost, and reliability issues, along with stringent skew requirements for clock and data alignment.

Innovation Solution

A digital architecture that employs a single modulator to embed the clock within the data signal, eliminating the need for separate analog components and external phase alignment, and allowing for the direct generation of non-continuous data pulses for burst-mode waveforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If two separate modulators are used for RZ-DPSK modulation, then the modulation function is achieved, but the system size increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of modulators
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of two separate modulators (phase modulator and amplitude modulator) into a single modulator. The in-phase and quadrature components are generated digitally and combined into a single control signal that drives one modulator, eliminating the need for two separate modulator devices while achieving the same RZ-DPSK modulation function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single modulator is designed to perform multiple functions: it simultaneously handles phase modulation and amplitude modulation by receiving a composite control signal that contains both in-phase and quadrature components. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for specialized separate modulators for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If two separate modulators are used for RZ-DPSK modulation, then the modulation function is achieved, but the system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two expensive modulator components into a single modulator, directly reducing the bill of materials cost. The digital signal processing architecture generates all necessary control signals in the digital domain, eliminating the need for additional analog modulator hardware and associated cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If two separate modulators are used for RZ-DPSK modulation, then the modulation function is achieved, but the system size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates two modulator devices into one, directly reducing the physical footprint of the system. The single modulator design, controlled by digitally generated in-phase and quadrature signals, eliminates the space required for a second modulator while maintaining full RZ-DPSK modulation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Manufacturing precision

If two separate modulators are used for RZ-DPSK modulation, then the modulation function is achieved, but stringent skew requirements are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclock-data alignmentVSAvoidskew control requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the analog timing alignment mechanism (which required precise skew control between two modulators) with a digital signal processing approach. The clock signal is embedded within the digital data stream, and both in-phase and quadrature components are generated synchronously in the digital domain, eliminating the need for external phase alignment and skew control circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Device complexity

If a digital architecture with a single modulator is used, then system complexity is reduced, but the modulation technique must be changed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of modulatorsVSAvoidmodulation technique flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the modulation technique from traditional separate phase and amplitude modulation to a unified modulation approach where the in-phase and quadrature components are combined into a single control signal. This parameter change in the modulation method enables the use of a single modulator while maintaining RZ-DPSK functionality, and the digital architecture allows easy adaptation to other modulation formats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces system complexity, size, and cost by minimizing analog components and eliminating the need for external phase alignment, while enabling efficient generation of RZ-DPSK waveforms with embedded clocks, enhancing reliability and flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

An electro-optic modulator is a device that employs the electro-optic effect to modulate a beam of light. The electro-optic effect refers to the modification of a medium's refractive index which is caused by subjecting the medium to an electric field.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectro-optic effect: Electro-Optic Effects

Implementation Method 2

as a beam of light (e.g. a laser) passes through the crystal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight generation: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS9001925B1Digital architecture for encoding a return-to-zero differential phase shift keying waveform
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 L3 TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9001925B1 patent drawing
  • US9001925B1 patent drawing
  • US9001925B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A return-to-zero control signal for controlling a modulator can be generated from two separate streams. A first data stream can include a pulse for each logical one that appears in an input data stream, while a second data stream can include a pulse for each logical zero that appears in the input data stream. The first and second data streams can be combined in a manner that yields the return-to-zero control signal. The first and second data streams can be generated in digital circuitry, such as an FPGA, to minimize the analog path for generating the return-to-zero control signal.