Digital Slide Validation Using Core Alignment and Control Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for validating quality data associated with slides rely on manual inspection and subjective interpretation, leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in diagnostic workflows, and lack standardized processes for aligning stained cores into a reproducible form.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that uses a processor to receive digital slides, determine slide identification, localize stained cores of interest, align them into a standard form, and evaluate them using predefined thresholds by comparing to control cores, generating validation outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection and subjective interpretation are used for validating quality data, then flexibility in evaluation is maintained, but consistency and reliability of diagnostic results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of validation resultsVSAvoidmanual inspection process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual inspection process with an automated computer-based system that uses image processing algorithms and machine learning models to objectively evaluate stained cores, thereby eliminating subjectivity and improving consistency of validation results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the automated validation process to evaluate quality data independently without requiring manual intervention, using predefined criteria and algorithms to automatically determine validation outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual inspection methods are used for validating slides, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and diagnostic efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic workflow efficiencyVSAvoidautomated validation system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the validation process into distinct automated stages including image acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, evaluation, and reporting, allowing each component to be optimized independently while collectively improving overall diagnostic efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated validation and screening of slides before human review, pre-identifying potential issues and prioritizing cases that require detailed examination, thereby improving workflow efficiency by reducing manual workload on routine tasks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If standardized processes for aligning stained cores are implemented, then measurement precision and reproducibility improve, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracy of stained coresVSAvoidprocessing time for alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual alignment procedures with automated image processing algorithms that use computer vision techniques to detect, register, and align stained cores with sub-pixel precision, achieving high measurement precision without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts alignment parameters such as transformation matrices, registration thresholds, and evaluation criteria based on the specific characteristics of each slide, optimizing processing speed while maintaining alignment accuracy through adaptive parameter selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If automated validation with predefined thresholds is used, then objectivity and reproducibility improve, but adaptability to different evaluation criteria deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjectivity of validationVSAvoidflexibility in evaluation criteria
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic validation system where thresholds and evaluation criteria can be adjusted based on the specific application, tissue type, and staining protocol, allowing the system to adapt to different requirements while maintaining automated objectivity through configurable parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by designing a flexible framework that can accommodate multiple evaluation criteria and validation standards through configurable parameters and modular architecture, enabling the same automated system to serve diverse diagnostic needs with consistent objectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12511752B1Apparatus and method for automatically validating quality data associated with at least a slide
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 PRAMANA INC
  • US12511752B1 patent drawing
  • US12511752B1 patent drawing
  • US12511752B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method for automatically validating quality data associated with at least a slide. The apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. The memory instructs the processor to receive, from the at least an optical device, at least a digital slide corresponding to the at least a slide, determine, using metadata, a slide identification, localize, using at least an object detection technique, the at least a digital slide, wherein localizing the at least a digital slide comprises identifying a stained core of interest and aligning the stained core of interest into a standard form, and, evaluate, using a predefined threshold, the stained core of interest, wherein evaluating comprises comparing the stained core of interest to a control core, generating a validation output, and transmitting the validation output to a downstream device.