Digital Slide Network for Pathology Second Opinions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical diagnosis systems face challenges in providing timely and accessible second opinions, particularly for pathologists who may feel uncomfortable rendering diagnoses outside their expertise, and patients who are denied or lack access to expert consultations due to long turnaround times and insurance reimbursement issues.

Innovation Solution

A network of pathologists providing digital pathology consultations through a system that digitizes microscope slides, facilitates real-time discussions via digital slide conferencing, and allows patients to directly pay for second opinions, ensuring expert access and reducing the risk of lost physical slides.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If physical glass slides are sent to consulting pathologists for second opinions, then expert consultation is obtained, but turnaround time becomes extremely slow (weeks to months) and slides may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidturnaround time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies (images) of the physical glass slides, allowing multiple pathologists to review the same specimen simultaneously without requiring physical slide transport. This digital replication enables immediate access to the specimen image, eliminating the weeks-to-months delay associated with mailing physical slides while maintaining diagnostic accuracy through high-quality digital imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of physical slide transportation (mailing, customs, physical handling) with an electronic digital transmission system. Instead of physically moving glass slides across distances, the system transmits digital images electronically, eliminating delays caused by shipping, customs clearance, and physical logistics while reducing the risk of slide loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If physical glass slides are mailed to consulting pathologists, then second opinions are obtained, but slides are frequently lost or never returned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidloss of physical slides
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital copies of the physical glass slides, allowing multiple pathologists to review the same specimen simultaneously without requiring physical slide transport. This digital replication eliminates the risk of slide loss while maintaining diagnostic accuracy through high-quality digital imaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the need to return physical slides by using digital images. The original physical slide remains safely at the referring pathologist's location, and the digital copy serves as a permanent, non-degradable record that can be reviewed indefinitely without risk of loss or degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Adaptability or versatility

If consulting pathologists are paid through insurance reimbursement, then second opinions may be provided, but reimbursement is uncertain and discourages willingness to provide opinions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to expert consultationVSAvoidcompensation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a direct payment model where patients or referring pathologists pay consulting pathologists directly for second opinions, eliminating the intermediary insurance reimbursement process. This self-service payment system provides immediate, certain compensation to consultants, removing the uncertainty and administrative burden of insurance claims while maintaining access to expert consultation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If patients request second opinions, then diagnostic quality may improve, but patients are often denied or feel uncomfortable requesting them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidpatient access to second opinion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a direct payment model where patients can independently request and pay for second opinions without requiring approval from insurance carriers or their primary care physicians. This self-service approach empowers patients to directly access expert consultation, eliminating bureaucratic barriers and making the process as easy as contacting any medical professional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11211170B2Second opinion network
Publication Date: 2021.12.28 LEICA BIOSYSTEMS IMAGING INC
  • US11211170B2 patent drawing
  • US11211170B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided to facilitate consultations between a referral source (e.g., labs, pathologists and patients) and a consultant (e.g., pathologist, radiologist, or other digital image analyst). Links between the various referral sources and consultants are established through a scanning center via a data communication network such as the Internet. The referral source sends a slide to the scanning center where the corresponding digital slide is posted for review and analysis by the consultant. Upon completion of the analysis and report, a digital slide conference is conducted through the scanning center that provides a venue for direct communication regarding the consultation. The scanning center may also facilitate payment from the referral source to the consultant.