Digital Standards Similarity Search Using Unified Attribute Types

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for searching and identifying similar objects within digital standards are inefficient and time-consuming, especially when dealing with complex and extensive industry standards, as they often require one-to-one comparisons of attributes with potential inaccuracies due to differing formats.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for performing document attribute comparisons by converting attributes to a defined data type for similarity comparisons, allowing for faster and accurate identification of similar objects across digital standards, even when attributes have different data types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If one-to-one comparison of attributes is performed across digital standards, then similarity identification can be achieved, but the process becomes inefficient and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimilarity identification accuracyVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms attribute data by converting different data types (string, integer, float, boolean) into a unified numerical representation. This parameter transformation enables efficient computational comparison while maintaining accuracy, resolving the contradiction between precise similarity identification and search efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual one-to-one attribute comparison mechanism with an automated computational system that uses data type substitution and algorithmic processing. This substitution eliminates time-consuming manual comparisons while maintaining identification accuracy through systematic data transformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If attributes with different data types are compared directly, then comparison can be performed, but inaccuracies occur due to format differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomparison speedVSAvoidcomparison accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter transformation by converting all attribute data types into a common numerical format. This allows attributes of different types (string, integer, float, boolean) to be compared accurately on the same scale, eliminating format-related inaccuracies while enabling fast computational processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal comparison framework that handles multiple data types through a single substitution mechanism. By defining a unified data type representation that can accommodate various original formats, the system achieves both high-speed processing and accurate comparison across diverse attribute types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250342160A1Similarity searching across digital standards
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 SAE INT
  • US20250342160A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342160A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342160A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment provides a method for identifying similar objects by performing document attribute comparisons, the method including: providing a digital standard system that includes a user interface and a data store of digital standards; receiving a request for a similarity comparison; performing the similarity comparison; generating a document similarity score for each of the digital standards within a group of digital standards; and displaying at least one of the digital standards from the group based upon the document similarity score. Other aspects are described and claimed.