Digital Strength Training System Dynamic Resistance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional strength training methods, such as fixed-track machines and free weights, often isolate single muscles or activate stabilizer muscles excessively, limiting the effectiveness of workouts and requiring manual adjustment of resistance levels.

Innovation Solution

A digital strength training system using a three-phase brushless DC motor with a controller circuit and sensors to dynamically control resistance, providing arbitrary applied tension curves and enabling continuous adjustment of resistance based on user position and movement phase.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional fixed-track machines or free weights are used, then equipment simplicity is maintained, but resistance adjustment requires manual intervention and workout effectiveness is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical resistance systems (weight stacks, cables, pulleys) with an electronic motor-driven system. A brushless DC motor controlled by a microprocessor dynamically adjusts resistance levels, eliminating the need for manual weight plate changes while providing programmable resistance curves. This substitution enables continuous resistance adjustment without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic resistance adjustment where the motor speed and torque are continuously varied during the exercise motion. Sensors detect user position and movement phase, and the controller dynamically modifies resistance in real-time to match the desired tension curve, rather than using fixed mechanical resistance throughout the range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If manual resistance adjustment is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and workout efficiency decrease due to time required for adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkout efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic resistance adjustment without requiring user intervention. The microprocessor-controlled motor autonomously modifies resistance levels based on pre-programmed exercise protocols and real-time sensor feedback, allowing users to focus on their workout without stopping to manually change weights or adjust mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Sensors continuously monitor user position, movement velocity, and applied force, feeding this information back to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically adjust motor output and maintain the desired resistance curve, enabling adaptive resistance modification throughout the exercise range of motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional weight stacks are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different exercise phases and positions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexercise phase adaptabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes resistance parameters dynamically during exercise execution. The motor controller adjusts torque and speed parameters in real-time based on the exercise phase, user position, and desired tension curve, enabling the same mechanical system to provide different resistance characteristics throughout the range of motion without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The motor-driven resistance system serves multiple functions that would traditionally require separate mechanical systems. It can provide variable resistance curves, simulate different weight conditions, adapt to various exercise phases, and accommodate different user strengths, all through electronic control rather than multiple dedicated mechanical mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers a versatile, efficient, and safe strength training experience by mimicking traditional weight stacks without the need for manual adjustments, allowing for dynamic resistance that can be instantly changed, thus providing a more comprehensive muscle workout with reduced reliance on stabilizer muscles.

Implementation Method 1

a three-phase brushless DC motor with a controller circuit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20240408439A1Exercise machine enhancements
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 TONAL SYSTEMS INC
  • US20240408439A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408439A1 patent drawing
  • US20240408439A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise machine is disclosed. The exercise machine comprises a tension generating device. The exercise machine comprises a translatable arm mount coupled to the tension generating device. The exercise machine comprises an arm coupled to the translatable arm mount. The exercise machine comprises a cable coupled to the tension generating device via the arm.