Reduced-Order Digital Twin Models for Machine Anomaly Root Cause

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine condition monitoring systems struggle to accurately identify the root cause of anomalies and are often dependent on labeled data, which can be difficult to collect, and high-fidelity physics-based digital twin simulations are expensive and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

The method involves creating a reduced order model (ROM) of a digital twin for a machine type, feeding current data into it, and comparing outputs to detect anomalies. If an anomaly is detected, the data is fed into fault models with specific component failures to identify the root cause by selecting the fault model output that most closely matches the measured data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-fidelity physics-based digital twin simulations are used to identify root cause of anomalies, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time and use of energy worsen due to expensive and time-consuming computations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates reduced-order models (ROMs) that are simplified copies of high-fidelity physics-based digital twin simulations. These ROMs retain the essential predictive capabilities for anomaly detection and root cause identification while requiring significantly less computational resources and time to execute, thus resolving the contradiction between accuracy and computation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple pre-computed ROMs representing different fault conditions that can be quickly evaluated without the computational burden of running full physics-based simulations. These lightweight models enable rapid root cause analysis by comparing actual sensor data against pre-prepared fault signatures, dramatically reducing the time and energy required for anomaly diagnosis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Loss of information

If multiple fault models are evaluated to identify root cause of anomaly, then loss of information is reduced, but device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identificationVSAvoidmodel evaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the root cause identification process into distinct fault models, each representing a specific component failure mode. By dividing the overall diagnostic task into separate, specialized models (e.g., pump failure model, valve failure model, motor failure model), the system can evaluate multiple potential causes without creating a single overly complex monolithic model, thus managing complexity while comprehensively identifying root causes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11899527B2Systems and methods for identifying machine anomaly root cause based on a selected reduced order model and a selected fault model
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11899527B2 patent drawing
  • US11899527B2 patent drawing
  • US11899527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying a cause of a machine operating anomaly including creating a reduced order model (ROMs) for a digital twin model of a selected machine type and feeding current data from a deployed machine into the ROM. The method can include comparing a current output from the selected ROM with a measured output from the current data and determining that an operating anomaly exists when the difference between the current output and the measured output exceeds a selected anomaly threshold. The cause of the operating anomaly can be identified by feeding the current data into a plurality of fault models, wherein each fault model includes a particular component failure, comparing a fault model output from each of the plurality of fault models with the measured output from the current data, selecting the fault model with the fault model output most closely matching the measured output, and displaying the identified component failure associated with the selected fault model as the cause of the operating anomaly.