System-of-Systems Digital Twin for Environmental Asset Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital twin solutions fail to capture the end-to-end functional behaviors of industrial systems and do not integrate the impact of environmental factors on asset management, leading to inadequate strategic decision-making.

Innovation Solution

A systemic digital twin manager is developed using a Σ (Sigma) modeling language and associated hardware architecture to model and simulate the lifecycle of industrial assets, incorporating environmental and operational data for predictive simulations and real-time optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing digital twin solutions are used to model industrial systems, then system visualization is achieved, but end-to-end functional behaviors and environmental factor impacts are not captured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of system modelingVSAvoidcompleteness of system representation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple hierarchical levels (system level, subsystem level, component level) with each level having its own digital twin model. This segmentation allows capturing functional behaviors at different granularities while managing complexity through modular representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension to digital twins by adding environmental context and causal relationship modeling. Instead of traditional geometric or operational digital twins, this approach incorporates environmental factors and causal mechanisms as additional dimensional layers, enabling comprehensive capture of system behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive digital twins are created to capture all system behaviors, then modeling accuracy improves, but computational resources and simulation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of predictive simulationsVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Causal models are pre-built and validated before actual simulations are run. These pre-computed causal relationships enable faster predictive simulations by avoiding redundant calculations, as the causal structure is already established from historical data and expert knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs simulations selectively based on user queries and critical decision points, rather than continuously running all possible scenarios. This partial execution approach maintains precision for critical analyses while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If real-time data synchronization is implemented between physical and digital twins, then operational optimization improves, but data processing complexity and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time optimization capabilityVSAvoiddata synchronization latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where real-time data from physical systems continuously updates digital twins, which then generate predictions and recommendations that feed back to operational systems. This feedback mechanism enables real-time optimization by closing the loop between sensing, modeling, and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary data processing layer is introduced between physical systems and digital twins, using edge computing nodes to pre-process and filter data locally. This intermediary layer reduces the volume of data needing transmission and processing in real-time, minimizing latency while maintaining synchronization accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If environmental factors are integrated into digital twin models, then predictive capabilities improve, but model complexity and data requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictive accuracyVSAvoiddata volume required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of environmental factor integration to different parts of the model based on their relevance to specific predictions. Critical components receiving detailed environmental data, while less critical components use simplified models, optimizing the balance between predictive accuracy and data requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260010673A1Method for modeling and simulating a system of systems
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 C E S A M E S SYSTEMIC INTELLIGENCE PTE LTD
  • US20260010673A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for modeling and simulating a system of systems, involving a technical system of interest as well as of a plurality of systems external to the technical system of interest, forming the environment wherein the system of interest evolves.