Digital Twin Structural Monitoring for Autonomous Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AI agent systems lack a comprehensive approach that integrates all necessary components for a versatile and adaptable system, with limitations in sensor networks, data preprocessing, learning modules, actuator flexibility, and human/system interfaces, leading to incomplete or inaccurate decision-making and restricted interaction capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive AI agent system that integrates advanced sensor networks, optimized data preprocessing techniques, flexible learning modules, and intuitive human interfaces, enabling continuous adaptation and seamless interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If existing AI agent systems use sensor networks for data collection, then data can be gathered for processing, but the sensor networks are limited in scope or capacity leading to incomplete or inaccurate data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidsensor network capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional sensor network architecture where sensors can detect multiple types of structural parameters (vibration, strain, temperature, acoustic emissions) simultaneously. The system integrates diverse sensor types into a unified network that adapts to different monitoring requirements, allowing the same infrastructure to serve multiple measurement functions and thereby improving data completeness without requiring separate specialized networks for each parameter type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor network is designed with dynamic capabilities including adjustable sampling rates, reconfigurable sensor placements, and adaptive data collection strategies. The system can dynamically activate or deactivate specific sensors based on structural conditions and monitoring priorities, allowing the network capacity to flexibly adapt to varying data requirements and improve overall data completeness under different operational scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If data preprocessing is performed to remove noise and extract features, then decision-making quality can be improved, but the preprocessing may not be optimized for efficiency and effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidpreprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary data preprocessing steps directly at the sensor level and edge computing devices before data reaches the central processing system. Noise filtering and feature extraction are performed in advance on raw sensor signals, reducing the computational burden on central systems and improving overall processing efficiency while maintaining high decision-making accuracy through optimized preprocessing algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The data preprocessing function is segmented and distributed across multiple levels: initial filtering at sensor level, intermediate processing at edge devices, and advanced analysis at central systems. This segmented approach allows each processing stage to be optimized independently for its specific task, improving overall efficiency while maintaining comprehensive feature extraction for accurate decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If learning modules are implemented for continuous adaptation, then AI agent performance can improve over time, but the learning capabilities may be limited in scope or effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelearning capabilityVSAvoidperformance improvement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multi-loop feedback mechanisms where performance data from actual structural monitoring tasks is continuously fed back to the learning modules. The system uses reinforcement learning with rewards based on prediction accuracy and maintenance decision quality, allowing the AI agent to continuously adapt and improve its performance. The feedback loops ensure that learning is grounded in real operational effectiveness, maintaining reliability while enhancing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If actuator modules are used to execute actions, then the system can respond to environment, but the actuators may lack flexibility to execute a wide range of actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction capabilityVSAvoidactuator flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator module is designed as a universal interface capable of executing multiple types of actions including alerts, notifications, control commands, and maintenance scheduling. Rather than requiring specialized actuators for each action type, the system uses a single versatile actuator module that can adapt its output format and target based on the decision requirements, thereby improving interaction capability while maintaining actuator flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

5Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive integration of all components is achieved, then a versatile AI agent system can be created, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent structures the comprehensive AI agent system into distinct modular components: sensor network module, data preprocessing module, learning module, reasoning module, actuator module, and user interface module. Each module is independently designed and can be developed, tested, and maintained separately. The modules communicate through standardized interfaces, allowing comprehensive integration to achieve versatility while managing complexity through clear separation of concerns and modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260072430A1Real-Time Digital-Twin Structural Health Monitoring and Autonomous Maintenance System
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 VIKING DISCOVERIES LLC
  • US20260072430A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072430A1 patent drawing
  • US20260072430A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural-health-monitoring system is disclosed for real-time detection and autonomous maintenance of physical structures. The system includes a sensor network comprising at least one strain gauge and one tri-axial accelerometer mounted on the structure to generate real-time sensor signals. A perception module filters and normalizes the signals and extracts numerical features such as peak amplitude and dominant frequency. A digital-twin module maintains a finite-element model updated in response to the extracted features. A data-driven surrogate model predicts sensor behavior and refines itself using machine-learning techniques. An anomaly-detection module computes an anomaly score from model residuals or classifier outputs. Upon exceeding a threshold, a maintenance module initiates a maintenance action, including generating an inspection schedule or issuing a control signal to an autonomous inspection or repair device. A learning module continuously improves system performance using reinforcement learning based on historical outcomes. The system supports predictive diagnostics, robotic repair, and automated optimization for long-term structural integrity.