Digital Twin Modeling for High-Fidelity Component Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing representations of physical systems, such as 3D models, do not effectively facilitate troubleshooting or simulating the effects of changes without requiring time-consuming and challenging modifications to the actual system.

Innovation Solution

A digital twin system that models and simulates the behavior of physical systems using real-time data ingestion, allowing for 'what-if' scenario testing and control of physical components without altering the actual system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a 3D model of a physical system is created to visualize component locations, then the ease of operation for engineers is improved, but the ability to troubleshoot and simulate system changes is worsened because it requires time-consuming modifications to the actual system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidtime-consuming modifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin, which is a virtual copy of the physical system that replicates its behavior and characteristics. This digital replica allows engineers to simulate changes, troubleshoot issues, and analyze system performance without physically modifying the actual system, thereby eliminating time-consuming modifications while maintaining operational ease

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin enables preliminary testing and simulation of system changes before implementing them on the physical system. Engineers can pre-analyze potential modifications, predict outcomes, and optimize configurations in the virtual environment, saving time by avoiding trial-and-error physical modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If changes are made to the physical system to troubleshoot issues, then the reliability of troubleshooting is improved, but the productivity is worsened due to the challenging and time-consuming process

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By using a digital twin as a virtual replica, engineers can perform troubleshooting and testing in the digital domain with the same reliability as physical testing, while dramatically improving productivity by eliminating the need for time-consuming physical modifications and iterative testing cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If a digital twin system is implemented to simulate system changes, then the productivity is improved by reducing time and resource usage, but the device complexity is worsened due to the need for high fidelity modeling

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The digital twin model focuses computational resources on capturing only the essential local characteristics and behaviors relevant to the specific troubleshooting or simulation task, rather than modeling every detail of the physical system. This selective approach maintains high fidelity where needed while reducing overall model complexity and computational requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260087202A1Digital twin models for components and systems of components
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US20260087202A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087202A1 patent drawing
  • US20260087202A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A digital twin service of a provider network allows a user to build high fidelity models (“digital twins”) for components and for systems of multiple components. For a given component, the digital twin service receives, from a user, identification of interactions for the component (e.g., inputs/outputs at the boundary), identification of data sources at the system (e.g., sensor that stream data), and/or a definition of behavior of the component (e.g., one or more behavior functions to simulate the component). The digital twin service builds a digital twin model of the component based at least on the interactions, the data sources, and the behavior. The digital twin service may also receive, from the user, an indication to bind one or more outputs of the digital twin model to one or more inputs of at least another of the digital twin models to build a digital twin model of the system.