Digital Twin Difference Detection in Automated Installations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Differences between automated installations and their digital twins often arise due to local conditions or inaccuracies in assembly specifications, leading to significant manual effort in maintaining consistency, especially when expansions or changes occur in the real installation without updating the digital twin.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus involving a sensor unit fastened to process material to continuously record measurement variables, comparing these with simulated variables from the digital twin, and identifying differences by analyzing temporal profiles to locate discrepancies within the automated installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection and comparison methods are used to verify consistency between real installation and digital twin, then measurement precision can be maintained, but loss of time and productivity decrease significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency verification accuracyVSAvoidtime for manual inspection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual sensor unit as a digital copy of the real sensor unit. This virtual copy records virtual measurement variables that are then compared with real measurement variables from the physical sensor unit, enabling automated verification of consistency between the real installation and its digital twin without manual inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical inspection process with an automated computational system. The control unit automatically records, compares, and evaluates measurement variables from both real and virtual sensor units, substituting human expert analysis with automated data processing and deviation detection algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If digital twin is updated manually after changes in real installation, then manufacturing precision can be maintained, but loss of time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedigital twin accuracyVSAvoidupdate efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the control unit continuously compares real measurement variables from the sensor unit with virtual measurement variables from the virtual sensor unit. When deviations are detected, the system automatically identifies the affected areas and triggers updates to the digital twin, ensuring continuous synchronization without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and comparing measurement variables in real-time during installation and operation. This continuous preliminary detection of deviations allows the digital twin to be updated proactively before inconsistencies affect production, rather than waiting for manual verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated sensor unit is deployed to record measurement variables, then productivity and speed improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifference detection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the sensor unit and control unit multi-functional by enabling them to perform both real-time measurement recording and automated comparison evaluation functions. The same hardware infrastructure supports multiple operations including data acquisition, virtual twin synchronization, deviation detection, and automatic update triggering, reducing overall system complexity despite increased functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11360456B2Apparatus and method for identifying differences between a real installation and a digital twin of the installation
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 SIEMENS AG
  • US11360456B2 patent drawing
  • US11360456B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for determining differences between an automated installation and a digital twin of the automated installation and to an automated installation that includes the apparatus, wherein a sensor unit is fastened to a process material and passes through an automated installation together with the process material where, during this process, the sensor unit continuously records at least one measurement variable, a temporal profile of the recorded measurement variable is compared with a temporal profile of a corresponding simulated measurement variable and if there is a difference between the temporal profiles, then the location in the automated installation at which the difference is present is identified.