Digital Twin Model Updating for Time-Varying Prediction Error

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current model updating methods in systems engineering are limited by the assumption of prediction error as an independent Gaussian white noise process, leading to biased estimation and incorrect uncertainty quantification due to modeling errors and time-varying uncertainties.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive recursive Bayesian inference framework is employed to jointly estimate model parameters and prediction error characteristics, including a non-stationary Gaussian process with time-variant mean and covariance, allowing for the management of modeling errors and measurement noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the prediction error is assumed to be an independent Gaussian white noise process for mathematical simplicity, then the model updating process is computationally tractable, but the estimation becomes biased and uncertainty quantification becomes incorrect due to modeling errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational tractabilityVSAvoidestimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static assumption of independent Gaussian white noise into a dynamic model where prediction error is represented as a non-stationary Gaussian process with time-varying mean and covariance. This dynamic approach allows the model to adapt to changing system conditions and capture temporal correlations in modeling errors, thereby improving estimation accuracy while maintaining computational feasibility through efficient inference algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of the prediction error model from fixed (independent Gaussian white noise with constant covariance) to time-varying (non-stationary Gaussian process with time-dependent mean and covariance). This parameter transformation enables the model to capture the evolving characteristics of modeling errors throughout the system's operation, resolving the contradiction between mathematical simplicity and estimation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the prediction error is modeled as a non-stationary Gaussian process with time-variant mean and covariance to account for modeling errors, then estimation accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the time-varying mean and covariance of the prediction error are continuously updated based on residual analysis from the model updating process. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt to modeling errors dynamically while using efficient algorithms to maintain computational tractability, balancing accuracy improvements with computational constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of inference algorithms that bridge the gap between the complex non-stationary Gaussian process model and practical computation. These intermediary algorithms efficiently compute the time-varying parameters without requiring full exploration of the computationally intensive solution space, thereby reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining estimation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If traditional Bayesian model updating is used with zero-mean Gaussian assumption, then the processing is straightforward, but the model updating performance degrades and parameters diverge under real-world conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidmodel updating performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the static zero-mean Gaussian assumption with a dynamic non-stationary Gaussian process model that adapts to real-world conditions. This dynamic model captures the evolving statistical characteristics of prediction errors, preventing parameter divergence and maintaining reliable model updating performance while preserving reasonable processing simplicity through efficient inference methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240411279A1Systems and methods for managing complex systems
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE
  • US20240411279A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411279A1 patent drawing
  • US20240411279A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for creating and using digital models of real-world systems with a learning or data assimilation method. The systems and methods may be used to create and/or use a quantifiable model of a real-world system formed of a variety of sub-systems. and create and/or manage or quantified error or bias of the model. The learning network may be used to jointly estimate model parameters, dynamic input loads, and the statistical characteristics of the prediction error that includes the effects of modeling error and measurement noise. The learning network may be an adaptive recursive Bayesian inference framework. The prediction error may be of the form of a non-stationary Gaussian process with unknown and time-variant mean vector and covariance matrix to be estimated.