Digital Twin Object Detection With 3D Model Matching and Warnings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital twin production line systems struggle to accurately identify and respond to uncertain physical objects from non-production line systems, leading to potential safety hazards and operational disruptions due to manual monitoring and subjective judgments.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent identification and warning method using a deep learning algorithm, specifically YOLO, for detecting uncertain physical objects, coupled with a model library and binocular vision for size detection, automatically warns of dangers and synchronizes virtual models with the physical production line, reducing human error and ensuring timely responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual monitoring and subjective judgment are used to identify uncertain objects, then the system complexity is low, but the identification accuracy and response speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual monitoring and subjective judgment with an automated deep learning-based object detection system. The system uses trained detection models to automatically identify uncertain objects in the production line, substituting human mechanical observation with algorithmic image processing and analysis, thereby improving identification accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated detection and classification of uncertain objects without requiring continuous human intervention. The deep learning model autonomously processes images, identifies objects, determines their states, and triggers appropriate responses, enabling the system to serve itself in monitoring and alerting functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual monitoring is used to identify uncertain objects, then the device complexity is low, but the response time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual monitoring with automated deep learning-based object detection systems that process images and identify uncertain objects in real-time. This substitution enables continuous monitoring without human reaction delays, significantly improving response speed while the modular architecture keeps system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring and detection of uncertain objects without interruption. The deep learning model processes video feeds or images continuously, ensuring that no uncertain object goes undetected, thereby maintaining constant productivity and safety monitoring throughout the production line operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If conventional detection methods are used for uncertain objects, then the system is simple to operate, but the measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional detection methods with deep learning-based object detection that analyzes images and video feeds to identify uncertain objects with high reliability. The system substitutes manual or simple automated detection with sophisticated algorithmic analysis, improving detection reliability through trained models that can distinguish between different object types and states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and classification of uncertain objects before they become critical issues. The deep learning model continuously scans and identifies potential problems early in their development, allowing preventive measures to be taken before faults escalate, thereby improving overall system reliability through early intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of time

If manual identification of uncertain objects is performed, then the ease of operation is high, but the loss of time and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime consumptionVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual identification processes with automated deep learning-based detection systems that instantly analyze images and identify uncertain objects. This substitution eliminates the time consumption associated with manual observation and reporting, while the system remains easy to operate through automated workflows that require minimal human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous detection and identification operations without interruption or delays. The deep learning model processes incoming images continuously, ensuring that no time is lost between object appearance and identification, thereby eliminating gaps in monitoring that would occur with manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Measurement precision

If subjective judgment is used to determine object safety, then the system is simple, but the measurement precision and safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety determination accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective human judgment with objective deep learning-based analysis that determines object safety based on trained criteria and patterns. The system substitutes human perception and interpretation with algorithmic analysis that consistently applies safety determination rules, eliminating subjectivity and improving accuracy in identifying safe versus unsafe objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detection results are continuously evaluated and used to refine safety determinations. The deep learning model receives feedback from identified objects and adjusts its classification decisions based on learned patterns, improving the precision of safety determinations over time through iterative learning and validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11829116B2Intelligent identification and warning method for uncertain object of production line in digital twin environment (DTE)
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 ZHENGZHOU UNIVERSITY OF LIGHT INDUSTRY
  • US11829116B2 patent drawing
  • US11829116B2 patent drawing
  • US11829116B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent identification and warning method for an uncertain object of a production line in a digital twin environment, includes: establishing a model library for uncertain physical objects from a non-production line system; adding attribute data to the uncertain physical objects from the non-production line system; importing an established model library and added attribute data for the uncertain physical objects from the non-production line system into a model library of an existing DT production line system; performing auto-detection on an uncertain physical object entering a production line system; performing auto-detection on an actual size of the uncertain physical object entering the production line system; warning a danger for an unsafe object by means of voice prompting, system alarming and information pushing; matching a corresponding three-dimensional (3D) model in the established model library for a safe object; and loading a matched 3D model to the DT production line system.