Digital Twin Order Dressing for Off-Spec Manufacturing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional order dressing processes in manufacturing apply static rules, leading to 20-30% off-specification production due to equipment wear and material variations, requiring manual adjustments that are subjective and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a reinforcement learning model integrated with digital twin technology to dynamically adjust manufacturing characteristics by translating commercial product characteristics into manufacturing settings, leveraging historical data and real-time sensor feedback to maintain product quality within specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If static rules are used for order dressing, then the manufacturing process is simple and easy to operate, but 20-30% of production is off-specification due to equipment wear and material variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct specification complianceVSAvoidorder dressing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static order dressing rules into a dynamic system that continuously adapts to changing manufacturing conditions. The reinforcement learning model learns from historical production data and real-time sensor feedback to dynamically adjust manufacturing parameters, enabling the system to respond to equipment wear and material variations while maintaining specification compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensor data from the manufacturing process is continuously collected and fed back to the reinforcement learning model. This feedback enables the model to learn from actual production outcomes and iteratively improve its parameter translations, reducing off-specification production while maintaining system adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustments are made to compensate for equipment wear and material variations, then product quality can be maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and subjective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality consistencyVSAvoidorder dressing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the reinforcement learning model to automatically adjust manufacturing parameters without human intervention. The model compensates for equipment wear and material variations autonomously by learning from historical data and real-time feedback, eliminating subjective manual adjustments and significantly improving order dressing efficiency while maintaining consistent product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment process with an automated computational system. The reinforcement learning model substitutes human operators' subjective judgment with data-driven objective algorithms that continuously optimize manufacturing parameters, thereby improving both productivity and quality consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning model is implemented to dynamically adjust manufacturing characteristics, then off-specification production is reduced, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracy from commercial to manufacturing characteristicsVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by integrating multiple capabilities into a single unified platform. The reinforcement learning model simultaneously performs parameter translation, quality prediction, and adaptive optimization, while the digital twin framework provides both virtual modeling and real-time monitoring functions. This consolidation reduces overall system complexity despite the advanced algorithms employed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy (digital twin) of the manufacturing system that mirrors the physical asset's behavior and characteristics. This digital replica allows the reinforcement learning model to learn and simulate parameter adjustments in a virtual environment before applying them to the physical system, reducing the complexity of direct real-time control while maintaining high translation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If historical data and real-time sensor feedback are used to train and update the model, then the model accuracy improves, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel prediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel training and update time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing and organizing historical data during off-peak periods to create ready-to-use training datasets. The reinforcement learning model is pre-trained on extensive historical data before deployment, and incremental updates are performed efficiently using the pre-established digital twin framework, thereby reducing real-time data processing requirements and maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11868121B2Self-learning manufacturing using digital twins
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11868121B2 patent drawing
  • US11868121B2 patent drawing
  • US11868121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer programming products for self-learning order dressing rules applied to manufacturing products in accordance with received product specifications. The translation from commercial characteristics to manufacturing characteristics of the product being manufactured are learned and adjusted to meet the specifications for quality required by the provided commercial characteristics. Reinforcement learning models learn from the quality characteristics of produced products by applying positive scores when the commercial to manufacturing characteristic translation is on-specification, otherwise a penalty is applied when an off-spec product is produced. Digital twins of manufacturing equipment, simulated in real time, provide insight and recommendations for achieving correct quality characteristics. Sensors in each device or within the surrounding environment help digital twins to measure operational performance and lifecycle of the manufacturing equipment against historical baselines. Reinforcement models dynamically adjust equipment settings for producing products to account for equipment performance degradation over time and changes in operation performance.