Digitized Image Partitioning for Batch-Effect Robustness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Batch effects in digitized images, such as those caused by differences in staining or equipment, lead to inconsistent performance of machine learning classifiers trained on datasets from multiple sites, reducing model robustness and accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize image characterization metrics to systematically partition digitized images into training and validation sets based on similar presentational properties, ensuring that each set includes images from different batch effect groups, thereby training the classifier to handle diverse data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If machine learning classifiers are trained on datasets from multiple sites, then the quantity and diversity of training data is improved, but batch effects from technical variations reduce model robustness and accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity and diversity of training dataVSAvoidmodel robustness and accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process by creating separate batch effect groups based on technical variations (staining protocols, equipment models, technicians). The classifier is trained to recognize and adapt to these segmented groups, allowing it to handle diversity while maintaining robustness within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter space by incorporating batch effect group identifiers and technical variation parameters into the training process. This allows the classifier to learn parameters that are invariant to technical variations while maintaining sensitivity to biological signals, thereby improving reliability across diverse datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If data is collected from different batches with different preparation methods and equipment, then the versatility and applicability of the model is improved, but technical variations introduce batch effects that reduce consistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel applicability across different sitesVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-processing the data to identify and characterize batch effects before training the classifier. Batch effect groups are formed based on technical variations, and this preprocessing step ensures that the classifier is exposed to structured, labeled technical variations that it can learn to compensate for, thereby maintaining consistency across diverse batches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces batch effect group identifiers and technical parameters as intermediary variables that mediate between the raw diverse data and the classifier. These intermediaries allow the model to account for technical variations without being confounded by them, enabling versatility while maintaining stability through the mediating structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If random partitioning of digitized images is used for training and validation sets, then the simplicity and speed of data preparation is improved, but batch effects may cause the training and validation sets to have different presentational properties, reducing model performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata preparation efficiencyVSAvoidmodel performance and generalizability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-grouping images into batch effect groups based on technical characteristics before partitioning. This preliminary organization ensures that subsequent random partitioning maintains representation of all batch effect groups in both training and validation sets, preventing the mismatch problem while preserving the simplicity of random sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by ensuring that each batch effect group is locally represented in both training and validation sets. This means that within each technical variation group, the partitioning maintains appropriate distribution, ensuring that the validation set accurately reflects the training set's characteristics for each specific batch condition, thereby improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12412405B2Batch effect mitigation in digitized images
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV
  • US12412405B2 patent drawing
  • US12412405B2 patent drawing
  • US12412405B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed, cause a processor to perform operations. The operations include extracting one or more image characterization metrics from respective ones of a plurality of digitized images within an imaging data set. The plurality of digitized images have batch effects. The operations further include identifying a plurality of batch effect groups of the digitized images using the one or more image characterization metrics, and dividing the plurality of batch effect groups between a training set and/or a validation set. The training set and/or the validation set include some of the plurality of digitized images associated with respective ones of the plurality of batch effect groups.