3D Model Dimension Ranking for Scan Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

3D scanners often fail to accurately capture certain features or areas of objects, leading to incomplete or inaccurate digital models, necessitating supplementary measurements by users to achieve acceptable accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a model engine, analysis engine, ranking engine, and display engine that generates a 3D model, analyzes target dimensions, ranks them based on characteristics and historical scan data, and displays the most critical dimensions for user measurement, allowing for accurate model supplementation with reduced necessary measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If 3D scanning is performed to create a digital model, then the model can be used for various applications, but the scan may not accurately capture certain features or areas of the object

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan accuracyVSAvoidincomplete feature capture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides visual feedback to the user during the scanning process, displaying indicators that show which areas have been adequately scanned and which require additional scanning. This feedback mechanism allows users to identify and re-scan problematic areas, thereby improving overall scan accuracy and ensuring complete feature capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the scanned data to identify areas that were not accurately captured before finalizing the digital model. This preliminary action allows for targeted re-scanning of specific problem areas rather than requiring a complete re-scan, improving efficiency while ensuring accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If users take supplementary measurements to improve model accuracy, then the model completeness improves, but the time and effort required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different levels of scanning detail and measurement requirements to different areas of the object based on their importance and scan quality. Critical features that are difficult to scan receive more attention and require supplementary measurements, while well-scanned areas require minimal additional work. This localized approach minimizes overall time investment while ensuring accuracy where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial supplementary measurements only for specific problem areas rather than requiring complete re-measurement of the entire object. By focusing measurements only where needed based on preliminary analysis, the system achieves acceptable accuracy without requiring excessive time investment in comprehensive re-scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If all target dimensions are measured to ensure complete accuracy, then the model quality improves, but the complexity of the process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel qualityVSAvoidmeasurement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and identifies only the critical target dimensions that require measurement from the complete set of possible dimensions. By analyzing the 3D model and scan quality, the system determines which specific dimensions are essential for acceptable model quality and focuses the measurement process on those extracted critical dimensions, thereby reducing process complexity while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement process is segmented into distinct phases: automatic scanning, preliminary analysis to identify problem areas, targeted supplementary measurement of specific dimensions, and model finalization. This segmentation breaks down the complex process of measuring all dimensions into manageable stages, reducing overall process complexity while ensuring necessary accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3403243B1Ranking target dimensions
Publication Date: 2024.01.10 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP3403243B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3403243B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In one example implementation, a system for ranking target dimensions includes a model engine to generate a three-dimensional (3D) model of an object from a scan of the object, an analysis engine to analyze the 3D model of the object and determine target dimensions of the object, a ranking engine to rank the target dimensions based on target dimension characteristics, historical scan information related to the target dimension characteristics, or a combination thereof, and a display engine to display information relating to the ranked target dimensions of the object.