Dimensionality Reduction via Hybrid Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dimensionality reduction techniques fail to effectively minimize information loss and preserve essential data characteristics, particularly in high-dimensional data sets relevant to oilfield logging and visualization, where linear methods like PCA do not adequately maintain distance-based information.

Innovation Solution

A hybrid approach combining clustering, evolutionary computation, and particle-swarm optimization to transform high-dimensional data into a low-dimensional space with minimal information loss, using a neural network to embed user-defined essential features and optimize data transformation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional linear mapping methods such as PCA are used for dimensionality reduction, then the transformation is simple and computationally efficient, but the distance-based essential information is not preserved satisfactorily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoiddistance-based essential information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the dimensionality reduction problem from a linear parameter space to a non-linear optimization space by introducing an objective function (stress function) that measures distance preservation quality. This allows the system to optimize for information preservation rather than computational simplicity, directly addressing the contradiction between efficiency and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical linear transformation system (PCA) with an intelligent optimization system that uses evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization. This substitution enables the system to adaptively find non-linear transformations that preserve distance information, overcoming the limitations of fixed linear methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If dimensionality reduction is treated as a non-linear optimization problem using gradient-based approaches, then distance preservation is improved, but the complexity of the optimization process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance preservationVSAvoidoptimization process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the optimization process into distinct phases: evolutionary computation phase for global search and particle swarm optimization phase for local refinement. This segmentation allows each phase to specialize in different aspects of the optimization problem, improving distance preservation while managing complexity through structured decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic adaptation mechanisms where the optimization algorithm adjusts its search strategy based on the problem landscape. The hybrid evolutionary-particle swarm approach dynamically transitions between exploration and exploitation phases, enabling effective navigation of complex optimization spaces while maintaining distance preservation goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If feature selection and feature extraction are performed to construct a linear transformation matrix, then the dimensionality reduction is systematic, but the information loss is not effectively minimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystematic processingVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary feature selection and extraction to identify essential characteristics before applying the main optimization-based dimensionality reduction. This preliminary action prepares the data in a way that makes the subsequent non-linear optimization more effective at preserving information, combining systematic preprocessing with adaptive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary objective function (stress function) that mediates between the input high-dimensional data and the output low-dimensional representation. This intermediary measures and guides the transformation process to minimize information loss, acting as a bridge that systematically preserves distance relationships throughout the dimensionality reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10329900B2Systems and methods employing cooperative optimization-based dimensionality reduction
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC
  • US10329900B2 patent drawing
  • US10329900B2 patent drawing
  • US10329900B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Dimensionality reduction systems and methods facilitate visualization, understanding, and interpretation of high-dimensionality data sets, so long as the essential information of the data set is preserved during the dimensionality reduction process. In some of the disclosed embodiments, dimensionality reduction is accomplished using clustering, evolutionary computation of low-dimensionality coordinates for cluster kernels, particle swarm optimization of kernel positions, and training of neural networks based on the kernel mapping. The fitness function chosen for the evolutionary computation and particle swarm optimization is designed to preserve kernel distances and any other information deemed useful to the current application of the disclosed techniques, such as linear correlation with a variable that is to be predicted from future measurements. Various error measures are suitable and can be used.