Dimpled Stator Strut Geometry for Lower Gas Turbine Pressure Drop

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gas turbine engine stator cases with struts face challenges in efficiently guiding exhaust flow and minimizing pressure drop, which affects overall engine performance.

Innovation Solution

A stator case design featuring an outer ring and inner ring supported by circumferentially spaced struts, with airfoil sections and strategically placed dimples on the struts to introduce turbulence and reduce flow separation, thereby minimizing pressure drop.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If smooth strut surfaces are used in the stator case, then manufacturing is simpler, but flow separation occurs and pressure drop increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrut manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidpressure drop
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The strut surface is modified with dimples only in specific locations (leading portion and/or trailing portion) rather than being uniformly smooth or uniformly textured. This local modification creates turbulence in critical flow regions to prevent separation, while maintaining manufacturing simplicity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the entire strut surface rough or textured, only partial regions (leading and/or trailing portions) are provided with dimples. This partial action is sufficient to generate the needed turbulence and prevent flow separation without requiring complete surface modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Loss of energy

If strut surfaces are modified to reduce flow separation, then pressure drop decreases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure drop reductionVSAvoidstrut surface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex dimpled surface geometry is applied only to specific portions (leading and/or trailing portions) of the strut rather than the entire surface. This localized complexity achieves the flow control benefit while minimizing the overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The dimple modification is applied partially to only certain regions of the strut surface that are most critical for flow separation prevention. This partial modification achieves the desired pressure drop reduction without requiring complete surface complexification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of energy

If dimples are placed on strut leading portions, then turbulence is introduced and flow separation is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow separation reductionVSAvoiddimple placement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Dimples are concentrated in the leading portion (and/or trailing portion) of the strut where they are most effective at preventing flow separation. This localized placement focuses the manufacturing precision requirements to specific critical regions rather than distributing them across the entire strut surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively guides exhaust flow and reduces pressure drop, enhancing the performance of gas turbine engines by maintaining a turbulent boundary layer and minimizing flow separation.

Implementation Method 1

dimples on the struts to introduce turbulence and reduce flow separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulence: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

dimples on the struts to introduce turbulence and reduce flow separation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentEP3543463B1Stator case with strut for a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2021.08.11 RTX CORP
  • EP3543463B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3543463B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3543463B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A strut (66) for a gas turbine engine includes an airfoil section (67) extending in a spanwise direction (R) between a first platform (64P) and a second platform (62P), extending in a chordwise direction (C) between a leading edge (82) and trailing edge to define a chord length, and extending in a thickness direction (T) between a first side and a second side to define a chord width. Exterior surfaces of the airfoil section (67) define a leading portion (68) between the leading edge (82) and a widest location of the airfoil section (67) relative to the thickness direction (T), and a trailing portion (70) between the widest location and the trailing edge. The exterior surfaces establish a respective exterior contour for each span position between a 0% span position and a 100% span position. The exterior surfaces define a plurality of dimples (72) in the leading portion (68).