Dip-Coating Organic Electronic Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for more cost-efficient liquid deposition methods for producing organic electronic devices, which are essential for their widespread adoption and production.

Innovation Solution

The development of organic electronic devices with at least one dip-coated layer, where the layer thickness can range from 10 nm to 500 nm, utilizing a liquid medium with active materials, and a method involving substrate cleaning to achieve a water contact angle of less than 10 degrees for effective dip-coating, allowing for precise control of layer thickness and pattern formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If spin-coating or ink jet printing is used for liquid deposition, then device performance is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the deposition parameters by using dip-coating instead of spin-coating or ink jet printing. This involves modifying the liquid deposition process parameters (deposition method, substrate movement, liquid flow rate) to achieve comparable device performance while reducing manufacturing complexity and cost. The dip-coating method allows for controlled layer formation through simple immersion and withdrawal processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the essential function of liquid deposition from complex spin-coating or ink jet printing systems and implements it through a simpler dip-coating process. By removing unnecessary equipment and process steps while retaining the core liquid deposition capability, the method achieves cost-effective manufacturing without sacrificing device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If dip-coating is used for liquid deposition, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but layer thickness control precision may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidlayer thickness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by controlling the substrate withdrawal speed and angle during dip-coating, as well as the liquid flow rate, to precisely control layer thickness. By making these parameters dynamic and adjustable, the simple dip-coating process achieves precise thickness control (10-500 nm range) comparable to more complex deposition methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring and adjusting dip-coating parameters (withdrawal speed, liquid flow rate, immersion depth) to achieve consistent layer thickness. This feedback mechanism allows the simple dip-coating process to maintain manufacturing precision while keeping equipment complexity low.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If substrate cleaning is performed to achieve water contact angle less than 10 degrees, then dip-coating effectiveness is improved, but process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedip-coating effectivenessVSAvoidprocess time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing substrate cleaning and surface treatment before dip-coating to achieve the required water contact angle less than 10 degrees. This preliminary preparation ensures optimal surface energy and wettability, making the subsequent dip-coating process highly effective and reducing the need for rework or additional processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface energy parameters of the substrate through cleaning and treatment processes, achieving a water contact angle less than 10 degrees. This parameter change optimizes the substrate surface for dip-coating, improving layer adhesion and uniformity while allowing for efficient process timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of organic electronic devices with improved efficiency and performance, as demonstrated by higher current levels and luminance, and comparable device efficiency to spin-coated devices, while offering a cost-effective and scalable manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

dip-coating the workpiece into a liquid medium comprising active layer material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDip-coating: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 2

cleaning a substrate so that a surface has a water contact angle of less than 10 degrees

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWetting: Wetting

Data Source

PatentUS8481104B2Method of forming organic electronic devices
Publication Date: 2013.07.09 LG CHEM LTD
  • US8481104B2 patent drawing
  • US8481104B2 patent drawing
  • US8481104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods of fabricating an organic electronic device, which includes dip coating layers, and the devices made therefrom.