Wideband Dipole Array Differential Feed Common Mode Resonance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tightly coupled dipole arrays (TCDAs) face limitations in bandwidth and scanning performance due to the use of single-ended feeds, which are susceptible to common-mode resonances and electromagnetic interference, particularly when differential signals are required for 5G applications.

Innovation Solution

A differential feed configuration for TCDAs is introduced, utilizing a simple twin line configuration with a common mode mitigation element that shorts common mode resonance, eliminating radiation issues and maintaining scanning capabilities without the need for baluns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If single-ended feeds are used in TCDAs, then wide bandwidth and scanning performance are achieved, but common-mode resonances and electromagnetic interference occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebandwidthVSAvoidcommon-mode resonance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A common-mode mitigation element is introduced as an intermediary component between the feed line and the dipole element. This element acts as a mediator that blocks common-mode currents while allowing differential-mode signals to pass through, thereby eliminating the harmful effect of common-mode resonance without sacrificing the wide bandwidth performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The feed structure combines differential feed lines with a common-mode mitigation element to create a composite feeding system. This composite structure integrates both the wideband scanning capability of single-ended feeds and the common-mode rejection capability, resolving the contradiction between bandwidth and harmful factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If differential feeds are used to reduce common-mode currents, then impedance bandwidth increases, but scanning capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpedance bandwidthVSAvoidscanning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The common-mode mitigation element serves as an intermediary that enables differential feeding without restricting beam scanning. By selectively blocking only common-mode currents while allowing differential-mode signals to propagate freely, the element preserves the full scanning capability of the TCDA while achieving the impedance bandwidth benefits of differential feeding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If baluns are added to achieve differential feeding, then common-mode rejection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommon-mode rejectionVSAvoidfeed structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts only the essential common-mode rejection function from the complex balun structure and implements it through a simple common-mode mitigation element integrated directly into the feed line. This extraction approach achieves effective common-mode rejection while eliminating the need for external baluns, thereby reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The common-mode mitigation element is merged with the feed line structure, combining the feeding function and common-mode rejection function into a single integrated component. This merging eliminates the need for separate balun devices and reduces the overall complexity of the feed system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves a 9:1 bandwidth ratio and reduces common mode resonance, enhancing the antenna's efficiency and scanning performance while maintaining differential signal integrity.

Implementation Method 1

the common mode mitigation element is adapted to short the common mode resonance from the first dipole arm to the common ground plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCommon mode resonance: Resonance

Data Source

PatentUS11652299B2Wideband dipole array with differential feeding
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC
  • US11652299B2 patent drawing
  • US11652299B2 patent drawing
  • US11652299B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tightly coupled dipole array is an egg-crate configuration defined by a plurality of electrically connected antenna unit cells. At least one of the unit cells utilizes a short or conductive element that shorts the common mode resonance. Shorting the common mode resonance in an intentional manner removes instances of the common mode resonance. To achieve the shorting of the common mode resonance, a conductive element is connected with one of the dipole arms and connected to the outer conductor of the feed or a ground plane. This creates a grounding loop that pushes the resonance out of the band of interest.