Direct Drive Motor Feedback for Variable Viscosity Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial mixing systems face challenges with variable viscosity batches, requiring adjustments in impeller torque and speed, which are difficult to match with conventional single-speed induction motors, leading to inefficiencies and the need for costly gearbox systems to achieve proper mixing profiles.

Innovation Solution

A direct-drive motor system with integrated feedback sensors, including load cells and strain gauges, provides real-time process monitoring and control, allowing for independent adjustment of torque and speed to maintain optimal mixing conditions, eliminating the need for gearboxes and enhancing process reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single-speed induction motor is used to drive the impeller, then the motor structure is simple and cost-effective, but the motor cannot adapt to variable viscosity batches requiring adjustments in torque and speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adjust torque and speed for variable viscosity batchesVSAvoidmotor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from a static single-speed motor system to a dynamic system where motor speed and torque can be continuously adjusted. The motor controller enables real-time modification of operational parameters to match varying batch viscosity requirements, allowing the system to adapt its characteristics during the mixing process rather than being fixed at design conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the electrical parameters (frequency, voltage) supplied to the induction motor through a variable frequency drive. This allows continuous adjustment of motor speed and torque output to match the changing viscosity conditions of the batch, enabling the system to operate optimally across a range of process conditions rather than being limited to a single operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If a gearbox is added to provide torque multiplication and speed reduction, then the required torque and speed can be achieved, but the system complexity increases and potential leakage points are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque and speed outputVSAvoidsystem complexity and leakage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by removing the gearbox component from the drive system entirely. Instead of using mechanical torque multiplication through gear stages, the system achieves the required torque and speed characteristics directly through electrical control of the induction motor, eliminating the intermediate mechanical transmission components that introduce complexity and potential failure points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical gearbox system with an electrical control system. Rather than using mechanical gears to multiply torque and reduce speed, the invention uses a variable frequency drive to electrically control the motor's output characteristics, substituting an electrical field-based solution for a mechanical transmission system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If an inverter-rated induction motor with VFD is used for variable speed operation, then speed and torque can be adjusted, but the motor generates excessive heat and operates at low efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevariable speed and torque controlVSAvoidmotor efficiency and heat generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a closed-loop control system that continuously monitors motor operating conditions and adjusts the VFD output accordingly. Sensors monitor parameters such as current, voltage, and temperature, and this information is fed back to the controller which modifies the drive signals to maintain optimal efficiency and prevent excessive heat generation during variable speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic adjustment of motor operating parameters through the VFD, allowing the motor to operate at optimal efficiency points across different speed and torque conditions. The controller dynamically modifies frequency and voltage output based on actual process requirements, enabling the motor to adapt its characteristics rather than operating in fixed inefficient regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Speed

If the impeller diameter is reduced to match catalog motor specifications, then the motor can operate at 100% speed, but the throughput of the process is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor operating speedVSAvoidprocess throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the electrical supply parameters (frequency and voltage) to the induction motor, enabling it to operate at higher speeds beyond the traditional 100% rated speed. This allows the use of a larger impeller diameter while maintaining safe operational speeds through controlled frequency adjustment, thereby preserving both motor compatibility and process throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic speed control through the variable frequency drive, allowing the motor-impeller system to operate at optimized speeds for each specific process condition. Rather than being constrained to fixed speed ratios, the system can dynamically adjust operating speed to maximize throughput while maintaining safe operational limits, enabling larger impeller diameters to be used effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient and reliable mixing across varying viscosity batches, improving production rates and ensuring compliance with design parameters, thereby enhancing food and drug safety by providing precise control and reducing maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

A feedback system using strain gauges and/or load cells that are isolated from the hazards of the batch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

A feedback system using strain gauges and/or load cells that are isolated from the hazards of the batch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS20230054112A1Shaft driven devices with feedback
Publication Date: 2023.02.23 PRIME DATUM DEVELOPMENT CO LLC
  • US20230054112A1 patent drawing
  • US20230054112A1 patent drawing
  • US20230054112A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A direct drive batch mixing system including a vessel having an interior region for receiving a batch, a direct drive electric motor attached to at least one rigid point, a multi-axis load cell located between the motor and the rigid point to provide signals representing forces and moments in multiple axes, and an impeller located within the interior region of the vessel and engaged with the motor such that the motor rotates the impeller. Forces and loads on the impeller are directly supported by the motor and measured by the multi-axis load cell. In some embodiments, a programmable controller generates control signals that control the motor's speed (RPM), torque and direction of rotation, and receives feedback signals for adjusting the motor's speed and/or torque and/or direction of rotation.