Direct Reduction Shaft Charging and Discharge Using Vacuum Gas Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for charging and discharging iron ore and sponge iron in direct reduction shafts require large volumes of seal gas, leading to increased capital and operating expenses, and introduce inert gases that accumulate in the process gas, necessitating costly bleeding and environmental emissions.

Innovation Solution

A process involving vacuum evacuation and refilling with process gas from the direct reduction shaft to minimize the need for seal gas, reducing the risk of explosive mixtures and gas accumulation, and utilizing hydrogen as a reducing agent to produce sponge iron.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If large volumes of seal gas are used for charging iron ore and discharging sponge iron, then safety against explosive mixtures is improved, but capital and operating expenses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against explosive mixturesVSAvoidvolume of seal gas
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inert atmosphere by filling the charging and discharging vessels with inert gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide) before and during material transfer operations. This creates a safe environment that prevents formation of explosive mixtures between process gas and air, while requiring significantly less seal gas than complete system pressurization methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by evacuating air from vessels before introducing inert gas and process gas. This pre-preparation of the vessel atmosphere eliminates the need for continuous large volumes of seal gas during operation, as the safe inert atmosphere is established in advance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If large volumes of seal gas are introduced to the shaft, then safety against explosive mixtures is improved, but operating expenses increase due to gas production and handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety against explosive mixturesVSAvoidoperating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using the process gas itself (hydrogen or carbon monoxide from the direct reduction shaft) as the seal gas source. This eliminates the need for separate seal gas production systems and reduces operating expenses, while the inert nature of the process gas maintains safety against explosive mixtures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If inert seal gas is introduced to the shaft, then safety is improved, but inert gas accumulates in the process gas requiring costly bleeding

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidinert gas accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies extraction by removing the problematic step of introducing large volumes of inert seal gas into the shaft. Instead, inert gas is only introduced into charging and discharging vessels temporarily, then completely removed with the discharged sponge iron. This eliminates inert gas accumulation in the process gas circulation system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by establishing inert atmosphere in vessels only when needed for material transfer, then completely removing it afterward. This prevents inert gas from entering and accumulating in the process gas system, eliminating the need for costly bleeding operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If inert gas is introduced to maintain safety, then safety is improved, but environmental impact increases due to gas emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidenvironmental emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by using process gas (hydrogen or carbon monoxide) from the direct reduction shaft as the seal gas. When this gas is used in charging and discharging operations, it is completely recycled back into the shaft with the discharged sponge iron, creating a closed loop with zero emissions. This eliminates the environmental impact associated with inert gas bleeding and flaring

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces the need for seal gas, decreases operating expenses, and minimizes environmental impact by avoiding inert gas accumulation and bleeding, while enabling efficient production of sponge iron using renewable energy sources.

Implementation Method 1

evacuating gas from the ore charging vessel by application of vacuum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

reduced in a direct reduction (DR) process with a carbonaceous reducing gas to produce sponge iron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS20250230512A1Arrangement and process for charging iron ore to, and/or discharging sponge iron from, a direct reduction shaft
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 HYBRIT DEV AB
  • US20250230512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250230512A1 patent drawing
  • US20250230512A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement and process for charging iron ore to a direct reduction shaft, as well as an arrangement and process for discharging sponge iron from a direct reduction shaft. The processes each include the steps of evacuating gas from a vessel by application of vacuum followed by refilling the vessel with a process gas from the direct reduction shaft. Also provided is a system for the production of sponge iron including such an arrangement for charging iron ore and/or discharging sponge iron. Further provided is a process for direct reduction of iron ore, wherein the process includes introducing a process gas from direct reduction to a direct reduction shaft in conjunction with charging iron ore and/or in discharging sponge iron.