Directional Debugging Breakpoints for SCA Message Flows

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Troubleshooting Service Component Architecture (SCA) composite applications is complex due to their large codebase and intricate processes, making it difficult for users to identify and address issues effectively.

Innovation Solution

A user interface, such as a graphical user interface (GUI) or integrated development environment (IDE), is provided to allow users to set debugging breakpoints associated with specific message flow directions, enabling suspension of execution at particular breakpoints and providing context information like call stacks and variable values, allowing users to focus on specific message flow directions during debugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If users set breakpoints at all locations in SCA composite applications, then comprehensive debugging coverage is achieved, but debugging complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebugging coverageVSAvoiddebugging time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the debugging process by introducing directional breakpoints that divide message flows into distinct directions (request, reply, fault). Users can set breakpoints for specific directions at particular locations, rather than uniformly at all locations. This segmentation allows focused debugging on specific message flow directions, reducing the time spent on comprehensive but unnecessary debugging coverage while maintaining precision where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If users set breakpoints for all message flow directions at a location, then all potential issues are captured, but execution is suspended unnecessarily for directions that are working correctly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue detectionVSAvoiddebugging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different breakpoint configurations for different message flow directions at the same location. Users can enable breakpoints for specific directions (e.g., only request or only reply) based on where issues are suspected, rather than uniformly enabling all directions. This localized approach maintains reliable issue detection in problematic areas while improving productivity by avoiding unnecessary suspensions in working areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the codebase size and process intricacy of SCA composite applications are reduced, then troubleshooting becomes easier, but the functionality and complexity handling capability of the application decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting easeVSAvoidapplication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces directional breakpoints as an intermediary mechanism that simplifies troubleshooting without reducing application complexity. These directional breakpoints act as a filtering layer between the user and the complex message flows, allowing users to selectively intercept and examine specific directions of message flows. This intermediary approach makes troubleshooting easier by providing targeted control points while preserving the full functionality and complexity handling capability of the SCA composite applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9208058B2Providing directional debugging breakpoints
Publication Date: 2015.12.08 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9208058B2 patent drawing
  • US9208058B2 patent drawing
  • US9208058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for debugging an application are provided. In some examples, a user interface (such as a graphical user interface) is provided for a user to specify a breakpoint associated with a breakpoint location in an application and a message flow direction associated with the breakpoint. The message flow direction may be selected from one or more message flow directions associated with the breakpoint location. For example, a message flow direction may be a request message flow direction or a reply message flow direction. The breakpoint location may be a logical breakpoint location associated with a component in a component-based application such as an application based on Service Component Architecture (SOA). In an embodiment, an execution of the application is suspended when the breakpoint is reached in connection with the specified message flow direction.