Directional Detection Device for Speech Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional electronic devices struggle to accurately separate human speech from noise in noisy environments due to limitations in microphone design and frequency range, leading to inefficient voice recognition and battery life issues in portable devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using a directional detection system with multiple microphones and algorithms to determine the direction of an audible signal, employing cardioid and beamforming signal processing techniques to separate noise from speech across the full speech frequency range, thereby enhancing signal-to-noise ratio and reducing power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional single-microphone systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to separate speech from noise in noisy environments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeech separation accuracyVSAvoidmicrophone array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the audio signal processing task by assigning different frequency ranges to different processing paths. The first signal processing technique handles lower frequency noise, while the second technique handles higher frequency noise, allowing each path to be optimized independently for its specific frequency range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-microphone spatial processing to multi-microphone array processing, adding spatial dimensionality. By using multiple microphones arranged in specific geometries (linear, circular, rectangular), the system creates directional sensitivity and enables spatial noise rejection through beamforming and directional processing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the full speech frequency range (100 Hz to 8,000 Hz) is processed, then voice recognition accuracy is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoice recognition accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The frequency spectrum is segmented into different bands, with the first signal processing technique handling lower frequencies and the second technique handling higher frequencies. This segmentation allows the system to process the full speech range while optimizing computational resources for each frequency band separately, reducing overall power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of processing intensity to different frequency ranges based on their importance for speech recognition. By prioritizing processing for frequencies most critical to speech intelligibility while using lighter processing for less critical bands, the system maintains high recognition accuracy with reduced power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional filtering methods are used to reduce noise, then noise components are removed, but speech components are also suppressed along with the noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidspeech signal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different signal processing characteristics to different frequency regions. The first signal processing technique is optimized for lower frequency noise reduction, while the second technique is optimized for higher frequency noise reduction. This localized optimization ensures that speech components in each frequency band are preserved while removing the corresponding noise components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces directional processing and beamforming as intermediary steps between noise detection and noise removal. By first determining the direction of the desired speech signal and then applying directional filtering, the system can distinguish between speech and noise based on their spatial characteristics before applying frequency-based filtering, preventing speech suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If multiple signal processing techniques are applied to separate noise from speech, then signal-to-noise ratio is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal processing pipeline is segmented into distinct stages: direction detection, frequency band separation, and targeted noise reduction. Each stage handles a specific aspect of the processing task, allowing for modular implementation and optimization. This segmentation reduces overall complexity by breaking down the complex task into manageable, independent modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10362393B2Direction detection device for acquiring and processing audible input
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 LOGITECH EUROPE SA
  • US10362393B2 patent drawing
  • US10362393B2 patent drawing
  • US10362393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the disclosure generally include a method and apparatus for receiving and separating unwanted external noise from an audible input received from an audible source using an audible signal processing system that contains a plurality of audible signal sensing devices that are arranged and configured to detect an audible signal that is received from any position or angle within three dimensional space. The audible signal processing system is configured to analyze the received audible signals using a first signal processing technique that is able to separate unwanted low frequency range noise from the received audible signal and a second signal processing technique that is able to separate unwanted higher frequency range noise from the received audible signal. The audible signal processing system can then combine the signals processed by the first and second signal processing techniques to form a desired audible signal that has a high signal-to-noise ratio throughout the full speech range.