Directional Driver Demolding Mechanism for Undercut Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current demolding mechanisms for injection molded parts with undercuts in injection molds face issues with wear and tear, leading to increased cycle times, maintenance costs, and potential mold collisions due to complex mechanical coupling and precise coordination requirements.

Innovation Solution

A demolding mechanism featuring a first pair of drivers that allows form fitting only during the ejection direction, preventing accidental engagement during the return movement, and a second pair for retraction, ensuring wear-free operation and avoiding collisions by using beveled or rounded components to allow sideway movement and resilient mounting for the first driver.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex mechanical coupling system with multiple drivers is used to demould parts with undercuts, then the demoulding function is achieved, but wear and tear increases leading to longer cycle times and higher maintenance costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemoulding functionVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the form-fitting engagement function from the return movement by designing drivers that only engage in the ejection direction. The first driver is designed to disengage automatically during return movement, separating the ejection function from the return function, thereby reducing wear during the more frequent return movements and reducing maintenance time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies dynamics by making the first driver resiliently mounted, allowing it to dynamically adapt its engagement state based on movement direction. The driver can engage during ejection when force is applied in one direction, and automatically disengage during return when force reverses, reducing wear and maintenance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If precise coordination of drivers and slides is required for proper demoulding, then the demoulding accuracy is improved, but the risk of mold collisions due to wear and positioning errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedemoulding accuracyVSAvoidmold collision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by designing the first driver to automatically disengage before the slide can cause a collision during return movement. The resilient mounting and directional engagement design prevent the driver from forcing the slide into a collision position, proactively eliminating the collision risk rather than reacting to it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient mounting of the first driver acts as a cushioning mechanism that absorbs positioning errors and wear variations. The spring element provides a buffer zone that prevents hard impacts and collisions, accommodating variations in slide position without causing damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If form fitting is maintained during both ejection and return movements, then the mechanical coupling is simplified, but accidental engagement during return movement causes wear and potential collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical couplingVSAvoidwear and collision resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by designing the first driver with a ratchet-like mechanism that engages only in the ejection direction. The driver geometry is asymmetric, allowing form-fitting engagement when force is applied during ejection, but automatically disengaging when force reverses during return movement, preventing wear and collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the mechanical coupling into two distinct functions: the first driver handles ejection movement with form-fitting engagement, while the second driver handles return movement. This segmentation allows each driver to be optimized for its specific function, with the first driver disengaging during return to prevent wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP2808151B1Demolding mechanism of an injection molding tool
Publication Date: 2015.10.28 SCHOELLER ALLIBERT GMBH
  • EP2808151B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2808151B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C

AI summary

The invention relates to a demoulding mechanism (2) for demoulding an injection-moulded part having undercuts from an injection mould, having an ejector frame (4) for ejecting the injection-moulded part from a mould half (8) in an ejection direction and at least one pusher (6) movable and guided obliquely to the ejection direction for releasing the undercuts in the injection-moulded part. The ejector frame (4) and the pusher (6) comprise a first driver pairing (10, 16) , by means of which the ejector (4) can move the pusher (6) from the injection position obliquely to the ejection direction sufficiently far that the first driver pairing (10, 16) disengages because of the increasing distance between ejector (4) and pusher (6). According to the invention, the first driver pairing (10, 16) is designed in such a way that an interlocking connection is formed between ejector frame (4) and pusher (6) when the ejector frame (4) is moved in the ejection direction and an interlocking connection is not formed between ejector frame (4) and pusher (6) when the ejector frame (4) is moved in the opposing, return direction.