Directional Pressure Venting Radiator for Transformer Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transformer failures result in sudden pressure increases leading to catastrophic ruptures, releasing hazardous gases and liquids that pose environmental risks due to the inability of existing systems to effectively manage excessive pressure.

Innovation Solution

A containment system that directionally vents gases and liquids under excessive pressure conditions through a radiator with a circumferential joint that fails at a weaker point, directing pressure relief downward to prevent rupture, and includes header pipes with flow restrictors that adjust flow rates to manage pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a transformer tank is designed with standard pressure containment, then structural strength is maintained, but catastrophic rupture occurs under excessive pressure conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetank strengthVSAvoidpressure relief capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure relief function is segmented from the main tank structure by introducing a separate radiator component with its own circumferential joint. This allows the tank to maintain full structural strength while the radiator provides a dedicated, controlled pressure relief path that activates under excessive pressure conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The radiator acts as an intermediary component between the tank interior and external environment. It provides a controlled interface for pressure relief, where the circumferential joint serves as a predetermined failure point that directs relief away from the main tank structure, preventing catastrophic rupture while maintaining tank integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stress or pressure

If pressure relief is enabled without directional control, then pressure reduction is achieved, but hazardous materials are released into the surrounding environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure reliefVSAvoidenvironmental hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The circumferential joint is positioned asymmetrically at the bottom of the radiator, creating a predetermined failure point that directs pressure relief downward. This asymmetric design ensures that when the joint fails under excessive pressure, gases and liquids are vented away from the surrounding environment and equipment, converting a potentially harmful omnidirectional release into a controlled directional flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The design accepts that the circumferential joint will fail under excessive pressure, but converts this potential harm into a benefit by deliberately positioning the failure point to direct relief away from sensitive areas. The controlled failure of the joint becomes a protective mechanism that saves the main tank and surrounding equipment from catastrophic damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Stress or pressure

If flow restrictors are added to manage pressure, then pressure control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow restrictors are designed to provide automatic pressure control without external intervention. As pressure builds in the tank, the restrictors naturally limit flow through the radiator, creating a self-regulating system that maintains pressure within safe limits. The system serves itself by using the pressure differential to control flow, eliminating the need for complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively mitigates transformer rupture by creating additional volume and safely venting pressure, reducing the risk of environmental hazards and damage from excessive pressure events.

Implementation Method 1

The radiator is configured to directionally vent gases and liquids under excessive pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

header pipes with flow restrictors that adjust flow rates to manage pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow restriction: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentEP2166545B1System with directional pressure venting
Publication Date: 2018.06.13 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2166545B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2166545B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2166545B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

A system (10) comprises a tank (12), a radiator (14) connected to the tank (12), and a component (16) situated within the tank and susceptible to creating increasing pressure within system when under a fault condition. The radiator is configured to directionally vent pressure under excessive pressure conditions.