Disassembly Procedure Generation Using Assembly Work Element Insertion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for generating disassembly and replacement procedures are inefficient and lack usability for service technicians, as they do not effectively convert assembly procedures into usable disassembly or replacement steps, nor do they accurately identify faulty parts or calculate comprehensive costs.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based system that generates disassembly and replacement procedures by inserting new work elements into assembly procedures, using databases to associate work elements of assembly and disassembly procedures, and calculates total costs, displaying both procedures alongside their costs for improved usability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If assembly procedures are converted into disassembly procedures using existing database methods, then disassembly procedures can be generated, but the procedures lack usability for service technicians and do not accurately reflect actual disassembly steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisassembly procedure generation efficiencyVSAvoidusability for service technicians
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by inserting new work elements into the assembly procedure before conversion, and by pre-associating work elements of assembly procedures with corresponding work elements of disassembly procedures in the database. This ensures that when disassembly procedures are generated, they already contain the necessary detailed steps and cost information needed for usability by service technicians.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If replacement procedures are generated by referring to error code databases, then replacement procedures can be identified, but the system cannot accurately identify faulty parts or calculate comprehensive replacement costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplacement procedure identification speedVSAvoidfaulty part identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by monitoring whether new work elements have been inserted into the assembly procedure, and by using this information to generate updated disassembly procedures. The cost calculation feedback loop calculates costs for individual work elements and aggregates them to provide comprehensive replacement cost information, ensuring accuracy in faulty part identification and cost estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If detailed work elements are added to assembly procedures to improve disassembly procedure quality, then usability improves, but the complexity of procedure generation and cost calculation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisassembly procedure usabilityVSAvoidprocedure generation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by introducing a monitoring mechanism that tracks new work element insertions, and by using cost information as an intermediary to bridge assembly and disassembly procedures. The monitoring step acts as an intermediary between procedure creation and conversion, ensuring that detailed work elements are properly captured without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9959516B2Disassembly procedure generating method, apparatus, and system, and replacement procedure generating method, apparatus, and system
Publication Date: 2018.05.01 OLYMPUS CORPORATION(JP)
  • US9959516B2 patent drawing
  • US9959516B2 patent drawing
  • US9959516B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A disassembly procedure generating apparatus is configured to include: an assembly procedure editing unit that incorporates a new work element into an assembly procedure; an assembly procedure change monitoring unit that performs monitoring as to whether a new work element has been inserted into the assembly procedure; a disassembly procedure generating unit that generates, when a new work element is inserted into the assembly procedure, a disassembly procedure by using work elements of the assembly procedure into which the new work element has been inserted and by using information associating the work elements of the assembly procedure with work elements of the disassembly procedure; a disassembly procedure cost calculating unit that calculates a cost generated for the entirety of the disassembly procedure; and a procedure cost information displaying unit that displays, together with the assembly procedure, the disassembly procedure and the cost generated for the entirety of the disassembly procedure.