Single Lever Disc Binding Machine Punching and Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing disc-binding machines are complex, costly, and require significant user input, often resulting in uneven or damaged presentations due to inadequate sheet alignment and binding mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A compact, user-friendly disc-binding machine with a single lever that simultaneously punches and binds sheets onto discs, featuring sheet alignment mechanisms and a binding member that prevents creasing or tearing, capable of handling different paper sizes and disc diameters, and accommodating up to ninety pages in sets of sixteen.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If existing disc-binding machines are used, then binding function is achieved, but device complexity increases and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine complexityVSAvoidbinding quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the punching device and binding member into a single integrated mechanism actuated by one lever. The punching device includes a punch arm that simultaneously performs punching and binding operations, eliminating the need for separate punching and binding mechanisms found in existing machines, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining binding quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The punch arm serves multiple functions: it punches cutouts in sheets, binds sheets to discs, and acts as a lever actuator. This multi-functional component replaces multiple specialized components in existing machines, reducing overall device complexity while ensuring reliable binding through integrated design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If existing disc-binding machines are used, then binding function is achieved, but user effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser effortVSAvoidbinding efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges punching and binding operations into a single lever actuation. When the user pulls the lever, the punch arm simultaneously punches the sheet and binds it to the disc, eliminating the need for separate punching and binding steps required by existing machines, thereby reducing user effort while increasing binding efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine is designed with pre-positioned discs on the punch arm and alignment features that automatically position sheets. The user simply inserts the sheet and pulls the lever, with all alignment and positioning actions already prepared by the machine structure, minimizing user effort and maximizing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If inadequate sheet alignment mechanism is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesheet alignmentVSAvoidalignment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates alignment features at specific locations where sheets are inserted and processed. The punch arm and disc rack include localized alignment elements such as guide edges and positioning slots that ensure precise sheet alignment during punching and binding, achieving manufacturing precision without requiring a complex overall alignment mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The alignment mechanism is designed to automatically position sheets without user intervention. The guide edges and positioning features on the punch arm and disc rack self-align the sheet as it is inserted, ensuring precise manufacturing results while maintaining device simplicity by eliminating manual alignment operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If inadequate binding mechanism is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but binding quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding qualityVSAvoidbinding mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The binding function is merged into the punching mechanism itself. The punch arm, after punching the cutout, automatically performs binding by pressing the sheet onto the disc with the binding member integrated into the punch assembly. This integrated approach ensures reliable binding while maintaining device simplicity by avoiding separate binding mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The binding action continues seamlessly after punching. The punch arm maintains contact with the sheet and disc throughout the lever movement, ensuring continuous pressure for reliable binding. This continuous useful action ensures high binding quality without requiring additional complex binding mechanisms or separate operation steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS9539846B2Binding machine
Publication Date: 2017.01.10 WORKLIFE BRANDS LLC
  • US9539846B2 patent drawing
  • US9539846B2 patent drawing
  • US9539846B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A punching and binding machine used to bind sheets to discs. The machine may include a lever with a first arm, a second arm, and a third arm. Each arm may be pivotally and slidably connected to minimize the force required by a user to punch cutouts in a stack of sheets. The lever may include a flipper connected to a binding member to actuate punching and binding simultaneously.