Discontinuous Manufacturing Control Using Surrogate and RL Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling discontinuous manufacturing processes are costly and inefficient, requiring exploration of high-dimensional parameter spaces and often relying on time-consuming and computationally expensive simulations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method that uses a Surrogate Model (SM) trained with dataset pairs from both simulations and actual production lines, combined with a Reinforcement Learning Model (RLM) to optimize operational settings, allowing for efficient control of discontinuous manufacturing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If prior art techniques are used to implement reliable control of manufacturing line, then control reliability is improved, but cost increases due to high dimensionality parameter space exploration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliabilityVSAvoidparameter space complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital twin (virtual model) of the manufacturing line that replicates its behavior and parameters. This virtual copy allows for extensive parameter space exploration and control optimization without affecting the physical system, thereby maintaining control reliability while avoiding the complexity costs of exploring high-dimensional parameter spaces on the actual manufacturing line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs control optimization and parameter exploration in advance using the digital twin before implementing changes on the actual manufacturing line. This preliminary action allows thorough investigation of parameter spaces virtually, ensuring reliable control strategies are developed beforehand without incurring the costs during actual production operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If simulation data is used for control implementation, then data acquisition time is reduced, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata acquisition timeVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a digital twin as a virtual copy of the manufacturing line to generate simulation data. This digital copy enables rapid data generation without the time constraints of physical experimentation, while the computational model is optimized to balance accuracy with computational efficiency, reducing the energy cost of simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs transfer learning to adapt pre-trained models to specific manufacturing contexts by adjusting parameters rather than performing complete retraining. This approach significantly reduces computational costs while maintaining accurate predictions, as the model leverages existing knowledge from the digital twin and adapts it to specific scenarios with minimal additional computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If only actual production data is used for training, then model accuracy is improved, but training iterations are limited and material consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the digital twin to generate additional synthetic training data that complements actual production data. This virtual data source enables extensive training iterations without consuming physical materials or limiting the number of experiments, while maintaining model accuracy through the realistic behavior simulation of the digital twin.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a unified training framework that simultaneously utilizes both actual production data and digital twin simulation data. This multi-functional approach allows the system to leverage the realism of actual data and the unlimited variability of simulation data together, improving model accuracy while enabling extensive training iterations without additional material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If simulation parameters extend beyond operational limits, then boundary condition coverage is improved, but physical feasibility decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter range coverageVSAvoidphysical feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the digital twin to pre-test and validate control strategies that push boundary conditions before implementing them on the physical manufacturing line. The digital twin acts as a cushioning layer that absorbs the risk of physically infeasible parameters, allowing extensive exploration of parameter ranges including extreme conditions without compromising the reliability or feasibility of actual production operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin serves as an intermediary between theoretical parameter exploration and physical implementation. It mediates by translating extreme or boundary parameters into validated control strategies that have been tested in the virtual environment, ensuring that only physically feasible and reliable parameters are transferred to the actual manufacturing line while maintaining broad parameter range coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4535097A1Controlling a discontinuous manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 FUNDACIO EURECAT
  • EP4535097A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4535097A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4535097A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling a discontinuous manufacturing process and a system for controlling a discontinuous manufacturing process are provided. The method includes configuring a first computing module or system that implements a Surrogate Model, SM, reconfiguring the first computing module by retraining, the trained SM; configuring a second computing module that implements a Reinforcement Learning Model, RLM; and controlling the discontinuous manufacturing process.