Discussion Support Device Using Neural Network Facilitation Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems like Innocentive and Quola primarily focus on generating ideas and do not effectively support the organization or progression of discussions based on opinions and preferences, limiting large-scale decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

A discussion support device that acquires comments via a communication network and creates a facilitation structure using neural networks to extract and organize ideas, evaluations, and issues, allowing for intuitive determination of node relationships and parent-child connections within a tree structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If comments are acquired and summarized from large groups of people, then the quantity of ideas and evaluations increases, but the organization and progression of discussion becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of ideas and evaluationsVSAvoidcomplexity of discussion organization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The discussion content is segmented into distinct categories: ideas, evaluations, and issues. Each category is represented as a separate node in the facilitation structure, allowing systematic organization of large amounts of discussion data without creating unnecessary complexity in the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts key elements (ideas, evaluations, issues) from the comments and represents them as nodes in a structured facilitation model. This extraction process organizes unstructured discussion data into a manageable hierarchical structure that maintains relationships between different discussion elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If a facilitation structure is created to organize discussion, then the organization of discussion improves, but the automation level decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of discussion organizationVSAvoidautomation of structure creation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically creates and maintains the facilitation structure by processing comments as they are submitted. The structure self-updates based on new discussion content, eliminating the need for manual intervention in structure creation and maintenance while providing organized discussion framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The facilitation structure serves as feedback to participants, showing how their comments are organized and represented in the overall discussion structure. This feedback mechanism helps participants understand the state of discussion and guides further contributions in a structured manner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11847421B2Discussion support device and program for discussion support device
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • US11847421B2 patent drawing
  • US11847421B2 patent drawing
  • US11847421B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A discussion support device acquires, via a communication network, a plurality of comments relating to a main topic of a discussion, extracts a plurality of ideas, a plurality of favorable points, a plurality of unfavorable points, and a plurality of issues from the acquired plurality of comments, identifies a topology between the extracted plurality of ideas, plurality of favorable points, plurality of unfavorable points, and plurality of issues, and creates a facilitation structure to realize the identified topology.