Information Processor for Disease Recurrence Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current clinical prediction systems for disease recurrence, such as liver cancer, are inadequate due to their reliance on non-theoretically optimized discriminant features and inability to handle qualitative data, limiting their accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

An information processor that uses the discrete Bayes decision rule to predict the recurrence of diseases by calculating conditional and posterior probabilities based on feature subsets of both quantitative and qualitative data, allowing for the selection of optimal discriminant features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If scoring systems use non-numerical variables (qualitative data) for disease prediction, then the system can handle diverse clinical data types, but statistical information cannot be calculated and prediction reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle qualitative dataVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms qualitative data into quantitative representations by assigning numerical codes to categorical values (e.g., encoding disease stages, treatment types, and outcomes as numbers). This parameter transformation enables statistical calculations while preserving the semantic meaning of qualitative clinical data, thereby maintaining both adaptability to diverse data types and reliability of predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If discriminant features are determined through trial and error by medical doctors, then the system can be developed without extensive research funding, but the optimality of features is not theoretically assured and prediction accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem development easeVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated feature selection algorithms that independently identify optimal discriminant features from the data without requiring manual trial-and-error intervention by medical doctors. The system self-optimizes feature subsets based on statistical criteria and prediction performance, thereby maintaining ease of implementation while significantly improving prediction accuracy through theoretically grounded feature selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If molecular discriminant features are used to improve prediction accuracy, then the predictability of the scoring system is improved, but enormous research funding and long time are required for clinical trials and health insurance approval

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtime for clinical trials and approval
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes readily available, inexpensive clinical data that can be obtained through routine medical practice rather than expensive molecular biomarkers requiring lengthy clinical trials. By leveraging existing electronic health records and standard clinical measurements, the system achieves cost-effective and time-efficient prediction without the need for prolonged research and regulatory approval processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Device complexity

If preliminary determined discriminant features are used in scoring systems, then the system structure is simplified, but if any data on discriminant features is defective, the scoring system cannot be used and reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structure complexityVSAvoidsystem usability reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic feature selection that adapts to the specific characteristics of the input data rather than relying on fixed, pre-determined feature sets. The system automatically identifies and selects the most relevant features for each prediction case, adjusting the feature subset based on data quality and availability. This dynamic approach maintains relatively simple system structure while significantly improving reliability by avoiding failure when specific predetermined features are defective or unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11461598B2Information processing device, information processing program, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 YAMAGUCHI UNIV
  • US11461598B2 patent drawing
  • US11461598B2 patent drawing
  • US11461598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processor can logically support prediction based on past statistical information even though the information contains qualitative or non-numerical data. The processor determines whether an input pattern corresponding to an input object (a determination target) belongs to a specific class among multiple classes, based on feature subsets of any combination of a plurality of features, each feature comprises multiple categories. The processor includes a storage storing the input pattern corresponding to the input object and samples corresponding to respective sample objects and a classification determiner determining whether the input pattern belongs to the specific class. The classification determiner calculates a first conditional probability and a second conditional probability based on the number of the samples belonging to each category of the respective features, the first conditional probability is a probability that the data of the input pattern belong to categories corresponding to the respective feature for the specific class, the second conditional probability is a probability that the data of the input pattern belong to categories corresponding to the respective features for a non-specific class which is a class other than the specific class among classes, and the number of the samples is counted for each class based on the feature information on the samples and the class label information on the samples, and determines whether the input pattern belongs to the specific class based on the feature information on the input pattern, the first conditional probability and the second conditional probability.