Disjoint Field Sets for Multi-Type Channel Communication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Communicating between devices using different communication types and bandwidths is challenging due to disparate channel bandwidths and center frequencies, making it difficult for legacy and newer devices to interoperate effectively.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving and identifying sets of fields indicating channel bandwidth and center frequency index at a station, allowing communication with both legacy and enhanced devices by using disjoint sets of fields, where legacy devices see only one bandwidth and center frequency, while enhanced devices recognize both legacy and enhanced channels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single set of fields is used to indicate channel bandwidth and center frequency, then the communication protocol is simple, but devices of different communication types cannot be distinguished and communicate effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different communication typesVSAvoidcommunication protocol structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the communication protocol into separate field sets for different communication types. First communication type uses a first set of fields while second communication type uses a second set of fields, allowing each type to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system compatibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a communication type identifier as an intermediary element that distinguishes between different communication types. This identifier enables the system to select appropriate field sets and interpretation rules, facilitating interoperability between legacy and enhanced devices without requiring a complete protocol redesign

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If legacy devices use existing bandwidth and frequency parameters, then backward compatibility is maintained, but enhanced devices cannot utilize newer communication capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for enhanced communication capabilitiesVSAvoidinteroperability between legacy and enhanced devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic field interpretation where the meaning and structure of communication fields change based on the identified communication type. Enhanced devices can dynamically switch between interpreting legacy field formats and enhanced field formats, allowing seamless adaptation to different communication capabilities while maintaining reliable interoperability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters and structure of communication fields based on communication type. The first set of fields uses parameters appropriate for legacy devices while the second set uses enhanced parameters, allowing each device type to operate with optimal parameters while maintaining system-wide compatibility through the type identification mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11711828B2Apparatus and methods for communication with respective communication types
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 NXP USA INC
  • US11711828B2 patent drawing
  • US11711828B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Communications may be effected in a communications environment involving a plurality channels having disparate bandwidth and channel center frequency indexes. Communications are effected using first communications type with a first channel bandwidth and first channel center frequency index. Communications are also effected via a second communications type using a separate set of fields indicating a second channel bandwidth and a second channel center frequency index, the second channel bandwidth being different than the first channel bandwidth and the second channel center frequency index being different than the first channel center frequency index. The channel center frequency index and bandwidth communicated in each communication may utilize separate subfields.