Dispense Nozzle Shielding Device for Semiconductor Fabrication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispense nozzle systems in semiconductor fabrication face challenges in maintaining chemical purity and preventing particle generation due to evaporation and chemical reactions, particularly when the suck back feature is complex and costly, and external air can rapidly purge evaporated gases, leading to substrate defects.

Innovation Solution

A nozzle system with a shielding device, such as a shroud or shield gas, is used to create a mini-environment around the nozzle tip, maintaining a stable partial pressure of the dispense chemical and preventing external air from purging the evaporated gas, thus reducing evaporation and chemical reaction rates without the need for suck back valves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If suck back valves are incorporated into the dispense valve to eliminate drips and reduce evaporation, then substrate defect prevention is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate defect preventionVSAvoidsuck back hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function of the suck back valve (maintaining chemical coverage at the nozzle tip) and implements it through a simpler mechanism: a heated capillary tube that uses capillary action and thermal energy to maintain a meniscus of chemical at the tip, eliminating the need for complex vacuum-based suck back hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical vacuum-based suck back system with a thermal-capillary system where a heated capillary tube uses thermal energy and capillary forces to maintain chemical coverage, simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the dispense chemical is left exposed at the nozzle tip to maintain low partial pressure and high evaporation rate, then dispensing efficiency is improved, but particle generation increases due to rapid evaporation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing efficiencyVSAvoidparticle generation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter of the nozzle tip and surrounding environment using integrated heating elements, maintaining the chemical in a liquid state at the tip while controlling the rate of evaporation to prevent particle formation, thus balancing dispensing efficiency with particle reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If external air movements are allowed to purge evaporated gas from the nozzle tip, then evaporation rate is maintained, but chemical purity decreases due to airborne reactants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaporation rateVSAvoidchemical purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates an inert or controlled atmosphere around the nozzle tip using a laminar flow hood or enclosed chamber that limits exposure to airborne reactants, allowing controlled evaporation while protecting the chemical purity during the dispensing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively minimizes particle generation and evaporation rates, preventing substrate defects by maintaining a stable chemical environment and protecting the dispense chemical from airborne reactants, while reducing system complexity and cost.

Implementation Method 1

the shielding device configured to create a mini-environment for a dispense chemical such that a partial pressure of the dispense chemical is maintained in the shielding device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPartial pressure maintenance: Vapour Pressure

Implementation Method 2

the dispense chemical is held at the tip of the nozzle by the surface tension of the dispense chemical

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 3

the evaporated gas is quickly blown from the surface as the nozzle is moved from position to position, thereby maintaining a low partial pressure and a high evaporation rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

a micro-environment is created in the vacated part of the tube where a high partial pressure can be maintained and which is only reduced via diffusion, a much slower process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Data Source

PatentUS10685857B2Dispense nozzle with a shielding device
Publication Date: 2020.06.16 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US10685857B2 patent drawing
  • US10685857B2 patent drawing
  • US10685857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a nozzle system for dispensing a dispense chemical onto a substrate, the system comprising: a nozzle comprising a nozzle body and a nozzle tip; a shielding device coupled to the nozzle tip, the shielding device configured to create a mini-environment for a dispense chemical such that a partial pressure of the dispense chemical is maintained in the shielding device; wherein the nozzle system is configured to meet selected dispense objectives.