Dispensing Blender Jar Geometry for 3D Flow and Anti-Cavitation Mixing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing blender jar designs primarily address two-dimensional material flow, limiting the efficiency of blending processes and often require manual speed adjustments, which can lead to cavitation and strain on the motor, while also facing challenges in dispensing material effectively.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a blender jar with a floor agitator and sidewall bumps that promote three-dimensional material flow, combining vertical movement from the agitator with horizontal turbulence from the bumps to enhance blending efficiency and improve dispensing by strategically positioning a dispensing spout channel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If blender cutter speed is increased to improve blending efficiency, then blending performance is improved, but cavitation occurs and motor strain increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblending efficiencyVSAvoidcavitation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces vertical movement dimension to the material flow through floor agitators and sidewall bumps, transforming the traditionally two-dimensional horizontal blending motion into three-dimensional flow patterns. This dimensional change allows for improved blending efficiency without requiring excessive cutter speed, thereby avoiding cavitation while maintaining effective material processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies localized structural modifications at specific positions within the blender jar - floor agitators at the bottom and sidewall bumps at specific heights - to create targeted turbulence and vertical flow. These local quality changes enhance blending performance in specific zones without requiring overall increase in cutter speed, thus preventing cavitation while improving local mixing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If blade shape is made more aggressive to improve material movement, then blending performance is improved, but motor strain increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial movement efficiencyVSAvoidmotor strain
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds vertical movement capability through floor agitators and sidewall bumps, enabling material to be propelled upward and creating three-dimensional flow patterns. This dimensional enhancement allows milder blade designs to achieve effective material movement, reducing motor strain while maintaining blending performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional blender jar design is used, then manufacturing is simple, but dispensing efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejar design simplicityVSAvoiddispensing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into the sidewall bumps and floor agitators - they serve both as blending enhancement features (creating turbulence and vertical flow) and as dispensing optimization elements (positioned to align with the dispensing spout channel). This multi-functionality improves dispensing efficiency without adding separate components, maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly improves blending efficiency by breaking laminar flow and forcing material into more frequent contact with blades, resulting in finer particle sizes and improved dispensing performance, reducing uncrushed ice in sieves and enhancing overall blending performance.

Implementation Method 1

the floor includes an agitator that imparts vertical movement to material that is being processed in the blender jar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical agitation: Stirring

Implementation Method 2

A cutter assembly is attached to the drive shaft, the cutter assembly including a blade that rotates on the shaft inside the blender jar and above the floor, the rotation of the blade defining a blade path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical cutting and turbulence: Turbulence

Data Source

PatentUS7918601B2Dispensing blender jar
Publication Date: 2011.04.05 HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS INC
  • US7918601B2 patent drawing
  • US7918601B2 patent drawing
  • US7918601B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A blender jar defines a geometry to impart vertical movement to material being processed in the blender jar, and, alternatively or in combination, improves the horizontal movement to the blended material. By configuring one or more agitators on the floor of a jar, laminar flow or symmetric flow of material around the jar is disrupted. The material is forced in an upward direction in the jar and, therefore, into more frequent contact with the cutter blades rotating in the jar. A dispensing blender jar includes a hole in the jar wall that leads to a dispensing spout. The hole is positioned, at least in part, on the leading edge of a vertical bump in the sidewall of the jar.