Dispensing Device Collapsible Chamber Actuator Valve

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispensing devices for fluids are complex, costly, and unreliable due to their construction complexity, high production costs, and issues with air refilling, leading to container collapse.

Innovation Solution

A dispensing device with simplified structure featuring a collapsible chamber defined by an elastically yielding actuator element, using movable valve means integrated with the actuator for fluid control and a flexible edge for air refilling, reducing the number of components and enhancing reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional valve means (ball valves) and separate air refilling systems are used, then fluid control function is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve reliabilityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable element of the actuator element serves dual functions: it acts as both the fluid control valve (first or second valve means) and as part of the air refilling system. This merging of functions eliminates the need for separate valve components and air refilling mechanisms, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining reliable fluid control and air refilling capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator element's movable element is designed to perform multiple functions within a single component structure. It controls fluid passage (acting as valve means) and simultaneously enables air refilling into the container, reducing the number of parts needed and simplifying the overall device construction while ensuring reliable operation of both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional separate valve and air refilling system components are used, then fluid control is achieved, but production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice reliabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By combining the valve function and air refilling function into the actuator element's movable element, the number of separate components is reduced. This leads to lower production costs due to fewer parts to manufacture, assemble, and quality-check, while the integrated design maintains the reliability of both fluid control and air refilling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If traditional air refilling systems are used, then container refilling is attempted, but venting reliability decreases causing container collapse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventing reliabilityVSAvoidair refilling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The air refilling function is integrated into the actuator element's movable element rather than being a separate system. This simplification improves reliability by reducing the number of potential failure points in the air refilling pathway, ensuring complete and reliable container refilling without the complexity of traditional separate air refilling systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If more components are used for valve and air refilling functions, then fluid control precision is improved, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid control reliabilityVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The movable element of the actuator element is designed to perform both fluid valve control and air refilling functions in a single integrated component. This eliminates the weight of separate valve bodies, springs, and air refilling mechanisms, significantly reducing device weight while maintaining reliable fluid control through the multi-functional design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a more reliable, efficient, and cost-effective dispensing device with reduced dimensions and weight, addressing the complexity and reliability issues of existing devices by simplifying the structure and improving air refilling efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

at least partially defined by an elastically yielding portion of an actuator element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3393673B1Device for dispensing fluids or mixtures
Publication Date: 2021.05.26 TAPLAST
  • EP3393673B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3393673B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3393673B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention concerns a device (1; 100) for dispensing fluids (L), comprising means (3) for coupling it with a container (C; C) holding the fluid (L) and comprising: an outlet duct (63; 163) for the fluid (L); a collapsible chamber (60; 160) defined at least partially by an elastically yielding portion of an actuator element; first valve means (25; 125); second valve means (48; 148). One between said first valve means (25; 125) and second valve means (48; 148) comprises a movable element (47; 147, 157) belonging to the actuator element (40; 140). The invention concerns also a system for dispensing fluids (L), comprising a container (C; C) and a device (1; 100) as described above.