Dispensing System with Three-Axis Mechanism for Jam Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispensing systems require complex and costly configurations with multiple components, such as rotating coils and cradles, which can lead to increased assembly time and maintenance needs, and may result in jamming issues due to complex mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A dispensing system utilizing a three-axis mechanism allowing lateral, vertical, and longitudinal movement, with a cover and extendable members to facilitate precise and quick dispensing, and a method for releasing jammed items through coordinated movement of the cover and dispensing device.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If complex mechanisms such as rotating coils and cradles are used for dispensing, then dispensing functionality is achieved, but device complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing functionalityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex rotating coil and cradle mechanisms from the dispensing system, replacing them with a simplified linear actuation system. The extendable member is driven directly along a linear path through the dispensing passage, eliminating the need for rotational components and their associated complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The simplified linear actuation system with an extendable member serves multiple functions: it can dispense items of various sizes and shapes, and it can also retrieve jammed items by reversing its motion. This multi-functional design replaces the need for separate complex mechanisms for dispensing and retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional components such as shims, rods, and sleeves are added to accommodate different products, then product adaptability is improved, but manufacturing cost and assembly time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct accommodationVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The extendable member is designed to be dynamically adjustable in length and configuration to accommodate different product sizes. Rather than using fixed components like shims and sleeves, the system can extend or retract the member to match the required dimensions for different items, eliminating the need for multiple static components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical parameters of the extendable member (length, extension distance) to accommodate different products. This parameter-based adaptation replaces the need for physical components like rods and sleeves, simplifying manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If complex cam mechanisms and switches are employed for control, then dispensing control is achieved, but reliability decreases due to failure over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispensing controlVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical cam mechanisms and switches with a simpler actuation system controlled by a processor. The extendable member is driven by a motor or actuator that responds to electronic signals, eliminating wear-prone mechanical components like cams and physical switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system includes sensors that automatically detect the presence of items and the state of the extendable member, allowing the system to self-regulate its operation. The processor coordinates the extension and retraction based on sensor feedback, reducing the need for complex control switches and manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If a simple linear actuation system is used for dispensing, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to release jammed items may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism simplicityVSAvoidjammed item release
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic extension and retraction cycles of the extendable member to attempt to dislodge jammed items. The processor can command multiple extension-retraction sequences with varying parameters, using repeated periodic action to gradually free stuck items without requiring complex additional mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The extendable member can dynamically adjust its extension distance and speed based on the detected jam condition. The system can extend further or retract more forcefully than during normal dispensing, using dynamic parameter adjustment to release jammed items while maintaining overall system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12125333B2Techniques to dispense an item and release a jammed item from a dispensing system
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 TRINITY AXIS INC
  • US12125333B2 patent drawing
  • US12125333B2 patent drawing
  • US12125333B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of the present disclosure relate to dispensing and jammed item release techniques. A dispensing system comprises an arrangement of passages; a first device operable to move in a lateral direction along the arrangement of passages; a second device operable to move in a vertical direction along the arrangement of passages; a third device operable to extend or retract into a passage; and a cover operable to move toward and away from the arrangement of passages.