Dispensing Valve Flow Limiter Converter for Backflow Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dispensing systems for water treatment in pools lack a convenient and cost-effective way to convert from a normally open to a normally closed dispensing valve configuration when replacing cartridges, leading to potential backflow issues during cartridge replacement.

Innovation Solution

A consumer-friendly converter with flow limiters that can be securely mounted within the dispensing valve, allowing it to change from a normally open to a normally closed configuration without tools, using frictional engagement and deactivator mechanisms to prevent backflow when cartridges are removed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a normally open dispensing valve is used, then the valve allows continuous flow during operation, but it causes backflow and potential spills when cartridges are removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecartridge replacement convenienceVSAvoidbackflow and spill risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The valve transitions from a static normally open configuration to a dynamic system that automatically changes state based on cartridge presence. The flow limiter mechanism responds to the removal of the cartridge by closing the valve, preventing backflow while maintaining ease of operation during cartridge replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A flow limiter converter is introduced as an intermediary component between the water supply and the dispensing cartridge. This converter contains a valve that mediates the flow control, automatically closing when the cartridge is removed, thus eliminating backflow risks without complicating the cartridge replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a normally closed dispensing valve is used, then backflow is prevented during cartridge removal, but it requires additional conversion steps and complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackflow preventionVSAvoidvalve conversion complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional components: the existing dispensing valve, the removable dispensing cartridge, and the flow limiter converter. This segmentation allows the flow limiter to be added as a modular component that automatically provides normally closed functionality during cartridge removal without requiring complex conversion of the entire valve system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow limiter converter is designed to automatically respond to cartridge removal without requiring manual intervention or complex conversion steps. The valve within the converter self-activates to close when the cartridge is removed, providing backflow prevention automatically and simplifying the overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If flow limiters are added to convert to normally closed valve, then backflow is prevented, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebackflow prevention reliabilityVSAvoidconverter mounting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow limiter converter is designed to nest within the existing dispensing valve structure. The converter fits into the valve body and works in conjunction with the existing cartridge insertion mechanism, eliminating the need for separate mounting steps and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliable backflow prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The flow limiter functionality is merged with the existing dispensing valve structure. The converter integrates the valve closure mechanism with the cartridge replacement process, so that the same structural elements serve dual purposes: dispensing during operation and preventing backflow during cartridge removal, thereby reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables on-the-go conversion of dispensing valves to a flow-limiting mode, preventing backflow and minimizing the risk of spills or injuries during cartridge replacement, while maintaining normal operation when cartridges are installed, and allowing for easy resizing and upgrading of dispensing systems.

Implementation Method 1

The flow limiter is normally maintainable in a closed condition through the pressure forces acting on an underside of the flow limiter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure forces: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

using frictional engagement and deactivator mechanisms to prevent backflow when cartridges are removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11365553B2Dispensing systems
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 KING TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11365553B2 patent drawing
  • US11365553B2 patent drawing
  • US11365553B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for limiting the flow from a dispensing valve when a dispensing cartridge is replaced with the system including a dispenser cartridge with a cam and a water socket with a flow limiter therein that is activeable in response to the position of the dispenser cartridge in the dispensing valve and operable in response to an upstream fluid pressure in the dispensing valve.