Displaceable Control Surface for Aircraft Rotor Pod

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft control surfaces designed for pitch and roll in forward flight are ineffective in controlling attitude during hovering due to their aerodynamic configuration.

Innovation Solution

The aircraft features a rotor pod with a propeller and a control surface that is displaceable between two configurations, with the control surface being closer to the propeller in the first configuration and further in the second, allowing it to rotate relative to the body to control attitude in both hover and forward flight modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the control surface is positioned closer to the propeller for forward flight control, then pitch and roll control in forward flight is improved, but control effectiveness during hovering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectiveness in forward flightVSAvoidcontrol effectiveness during hovering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control surface is made dynamically repositionable between a first position (closer to propeller) for forward flight and a second position (further from propeller) for hovering, allowing the system to adapt its configuration based on flight mode requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The position parameter of the control surface is changed between two discrete states depending on flight conditions, optimizing control authority for each specific operating regime by adjusting the surface's distance from the propeller

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the control surface is positioned further from the propeller for hovering control, then attitude control during hovering is improved, but pitch and roll control in forward flight deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectiveness during hoveringVSAvoidcontrol effectiveness in forward flight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control surface position is dynamically adjusted based on flight mode, transitioning to a second position (further from propeller) during hovering to optimize control authority while returning to the first position for forward flight operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The positional parameter of the control surface is modified according to operational requirements, placing the surface further from the propeller during hovering to enhance attitude control effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed control surface configuration is used, then device complexity is reduced, but control adaptability between hover and forward flight modes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol surface configuration simplicityVSAvoidcontrol effectiveness across flight modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using multiple fixed configurations, the system employs a single dynamic mechanism that allows the control surface to transition between positions, achieving adaptability with minimal additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control surface serves multiple functions by being repositionable for different flight modes, acting as both a forward flight control surface and a hovering attitude control device through its ability to change position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the control surface's authority and effectiveness in changing the aircraft's attitude by optimizing its position relative to the airflow, improving control during transitions between hovering and forward flight.

Implementation Method 1

control surfaces aerodynamically configured to control attitude when airborne

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

a propeller mounted to the body of the rotor pod at the forward end

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReaction force: Reaction (physics)

Data Source

PatentUS11708147B2Aircraft with displaceable control surface
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC
  • US11708147B2 patent drawing
  • US11708147B2 patent drawing
  • US11708147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft includes a wing and a rotor pod mounted to the wing. The rotor pod includes a body having a forward end and an aft end. A propeller is mounted to the body of the rotor pod at the forward end. A control surface is mounted to the body of the rotor pod between the forward and aft ends and extends outwardly from the body. The control surface is displaceable relative to the body between a first control configuration and a second control configuration to control an attitude of the aircraft. The control surface in the first control configuration is closer to the propeller than the control surface in the second control configuration.